Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33413107›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2021

Comparative genomic analysis of Polypodiaceae chloroplasts reveals fine structural features and dynamic insertion sequences.

Shanshan Liu, Zhen Wang, Yingjuan Su, Ting Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. The First Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence of theCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Variations in genetic diversity in cultivatedFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shanshan LiuSchool of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhen WangSchool of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yingjuan SuSchool of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. suyj@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Ting WangCollege of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. tingwang@scau.edu.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31370364National Natural Science Foundation of China 31570652National Natural Science Foundation of China 31670200National Natural Science Foundation of China 31770587National Natural Science Foundation of China 31872670Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2016A030313320Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2017A030313122Project of Department of Science and Technology of Shenzhen City JCYJ20160425165447211Project of Department of Science and Technology of Shenzhen City JCYJ20170413155402977Project of Department of Science and Technology of Shenzhen City JCYJ20170818155249053Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2017A030303007Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou City 201804010389Science and Technology Planning Project of Shenzhen Municipality (CN) JCYJ20190813172001780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComparative chloroplast genomics could shed light on the major evolutionary events that established plastomic diversity among closely related species. The Polypodiaceae family is one of the most species-rich and underexplored groups of extant ferns. It is generally recognized that the plastomes of Polypodiaceae are highly notable in terms of their organizational stability. Hence, no research has yet been conducted on genomic structural variation in the Polypodiaceae.

resultsThe complete plastome sequences of Neolepisorus fortunei, Neolepisorus ovatus, and Phymatosorus cuspidatus were determined based on next-generation sequencing. Together with published plastomes, a comparative analysis of the fine structure of Polypodiaceae plastomes was carried out. The results indicated that the plastomes of Polypodiaceae are not as conservative as previously assumed. The size of the plastomes varies greatly in the Polypodiaceae, and the large insertion fragments present in the genome could be the main factor affecting the genome length. The plastome of Selliguea yakushimensis exhibits prominent features including not only a large-scale IR expansion exceeding several kb but also a unique inversion. Furthermore, gene contents, SSRs, dispersed repeats, and mutational hotspot regions were identified in the plastomes of the Polypodiaceae. Although dispersed repeats are not abundant in the plastomes of Polypodiaceae, we found that the large insertions that occur in different species are mobile and are always adjacent to repeated hotspot regions.

conclusionsOur results reveal that the plastomes of Polypodiaceae are dynamic molecules, rather than constituting static genomes as previously thought. The dispersed repeats flanking insertion sequences contribute to the repair mechanism induced by double-strand breaks and are probably a major driver of structural evolution in the plastomes of Polypodiaceae.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantGenetic StructuresGenome, ChloroplastGenome, PlantDNA Transposable ElementsFernsInverted Repeat SequencesPolypodiaceaeSequence AnalysisDNA Transposable ElementsDynamic evolutionInsertionsPlastomePolypodiaceae

Identifiers

PMID33413107
PMCPMC7792340
OpenAlexW3119770392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.