Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33412896›Full record

Trial reportBiological research for nursing2021

A Comprehensive Self-Management Program With Diet Education Does Not Alter Microbiome Characteristics in Women With Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Kendra J Kamp, Anna M Plantinga, Kevin C Cain, Robert L Burr, Pamela Barney, Monica Jarrett, Ruth Ann Luna, Tor Savidge, Robert Shulman, Margaret M Heitkemper

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biological research for nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. 'Eating with Others': planning, developing and optimising a self-management intervention to promote social eating for patients living with and beyond head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kendra J Kamp7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7753-3564
Anna M Plantinga7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kevin C Cain7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert L Burr7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Pamela Barney7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Monica Jarrett7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ruth Ann Luna3989Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Tor Savidge3989Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert Shulman3989Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Margaret M Heitkemper7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

NURSING MANAGEMENT OF IBS--IMPROVING OUTCOMESR01NR004142 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HEITKEMPER, MARGARET MCLEAN · 1996 to 2011
$5.5M
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON GI TRAINING GRANTT32DK007742 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY · 1996 to 2022
$4.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007742NINR NIH HHS R01 NR004142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeChanges in diet and lifestyle factors are frequently recommended for persons with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). It is unknown whether these recommendations alter the gut microbiome and/or whether baseline microbiome predicts improvement in symptoms and quality of life following treatment. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore if baseline gut microbiome composition predicted response to a Comprehensive Self-Management (CSM) intervention and if the intervention resulted in a different gut microbiome composition compared to usual care.

methodsIndividuals aged 18-70 years with IBS symptoms ≥6 months were recruited using convenience sampling. Individuals were excluded if medication use or comorbidities would influence symptoms or microbiome. Participants completed a baseline assessment and were randomized into the eight-session CSM intervention which included dietary education and cognitive behavioral therapy versus usual care. Questionnaires included demographics, quality of life, and symptom diaries. Fecal samples were collected at baseline and 3-month post-randomization for 16S rRNA-based microbiome analysis.

resultsWithin the CSM intervention group (n = 30), Shannon diversity, richness, and beta diversity measures at baseline did not predict benefit from the CSM intervention at 3 months, as measured by change in abdominal pain and quality of life. Based on both alpha and beta diversity, the change from baseline to follow-up microbiome bacterial taxa did not differ between CSM (n = 25) and usual care (n = 25). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Baseline microbiome does not predict symptom improvement with CSM intervention. We do not find evidence that the CSM intervention influences gut microbiome diversity or composition over the course of 3 months.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeIrritable Bowel SyndromeSelf-ManagementDietFemaleHumansQuality of LifeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Scognitive behavioral therapygastrointestinal microbiomeirritable bowel syndromequality of lifeself-management

Identifiers

PMID33412896
PMCPMC8755949
OpenAlexW3120900547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.