ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2021
Physical and Mechanical Properties of Resins Blends Containing a Monomethacrylate with Low-polymerization Shrinkage.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fracture Toughness, Work of Fracture and Hardness of 3D-Printed Denture Base Resins.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Physicochemical properties of flowable composites using isobornyl methacrylate as diluent monomer.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness (KH), cross-link density (CLD), water sorption (WS), water solubility (WSB), and volumetric shrinkage (VS) of experimental resins blends containing a monomethacrylate with low-polymerization shrinkage. MATERIALS AND
methodsA blend of bisphenol glycidyl methacrylate (BisGMA) as base monomer was formulated with (Bis-GMA)/triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), Bis-GMA/isobornyl methacrylate (IBOMA), or Bis-GMA/TEGDMA/IBOMA in different concentrations (40, 50, or 60 wt%). The camphorquinone (CQ)/2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) was used as the photoinitiator system. The KH and CLD were measured at the top surface using an indenter. For WS and WSB, the volume of the samples was calculated in mm STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).
resultsThe resins containing IBOMA showed lower VS results. TEGDMA 40% and TEGDMA/IBOMA 20/20 wt% showed higher KH values. The IBOMA groups showed lower CLD, while TEGDMA groups had higher values of CLD. The BisGMA/TEGDMA resin presented the highest values of WS, and for WSB, all groups showed no significant differences among themselves.
conclusionThe monomethacrylate with low-polymerization shrinkage IBOMA used alone or in combination with TEGDMA may decrease VS, WS, and CLD values.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.