Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33412360›Full record

ArticleMidwifery2021

Restructuring maternal services during the covid-19 pandemic: Early results of a scoping review for non-infected women.

Caterina Montagnoli, Giovanni Zanconato, Stefania Ruggeri, Giulia Cinelli, Alberto Eugenio Tozzi

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Midwifery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. National and Subnational Models of Care That Support Primary Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Study.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026
    Article
  2. A systematic review of COVID-19's impact on pregnancy outcomes.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Quality of maternal and newborn care in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study based on WHO quality standards.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caterina MontagnoliVerona University Hospital, Verona, Italy; Department of Midwifery, Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Geneva, 47, av. de Champel, Switzerland. Electronic address: caterina.montagnoli@hesge.ch.
Giovanni ZanconatoDepartment of Surgery, Odontostomatology and Maternal and Child Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Electronic address: giovanni.zanconato@univr.it.
Stefania RuggeriResearch Centre for Food and Nutrition-CREA, Roma, Italy. Electronic address: stefania.ruggeri@crea.gov.it.
Giulia CinelliPredictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy; School of Specialization in Food Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome Italy. Electronic address: giulia.cinelli@opbg.net.
Alberto Eugenio TozziPredictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: albertoeugenio.tozzi@opbg.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

objectiveThe novel coronavirus outbreak has caused substantial changes in societal norms as well as adjustments in health systems worldwide. To date the impact of these pandemic-related variations has yet to be fully understood also in the field of maternal health for which continuity of care is a proven life-saving preventive measure.

designFollowing the PRISMA guidelines for reviews, a literature search was carried out to assess different approaches that combine quality of maternal care with the imposed social-distancing rules. Nine studies were included in the scoping review.

findingsReduction of in-person visits is the preferred overall solution. Yet, fewer consultations can still guarantee essential services and appropriate care through integration with telemedicine. Referral to epidemic-free community centres is an alternative option and new paths need to include the interdisciplinary contribution of medical consultants and IT experts, among others. In this context, delaying access for symptomatic expectant mothers is still debated since it carries the potential risk of untimely detection of pregnancy complications. KEY

conclusionsPreliminary experiences provide an overview of the different attempts put in place to reshape health services to contain the pandemic hazards. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These early prototypes may inspire future innovative health solutions compatible with local resources and specific population preferences and needs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Maternal Health ServicesPrenatal CareSARS-CoV-2TelemedicineFemaleHumansPregnancyAntenatal careClinical distancingCOVID-19MidwiferyPostpartum careTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33412360
PMCPMC7832106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.