Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33412143›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Nonlinear Mechanical Properties of Prestressed Branched Fibrous Networks.

Hamed Hatami-Marbini, Milad Rohanifar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hamed Hatami-MarbiniMechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: hatami@uic.edu.
Milad RohanifarMechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random fiber networks constitute the solid skeleton of many biological materials such as the cytoskeleton of cells and extracellular matrix of soft tissues. These random networks show unique mechanical properties such as nonlinear shear strain-stiffening and strain softening when subjected to preextension and precompression, respectively. In this study, we perform numerical simulations to characterize the influence of axial prestress on the nonlinear mechanical response of random network structures as a function of their micromechanical and geometrical properties. We build our numerical network models using the microstructure of disordered hexagonal lattices and quantify their nonlinear shear response as a function of uniaxial prestress strain. We consider three different material models for individual fibers and fully characterize their influence on the mechanical response of prestressed networks. Moreover, we investigate both the influence of geometric disorder keeping the network connectivity constant and the influence of the randomness in the stiffness of individual fibers keeping their mean stiffness constant. The effects of network connectivity and bending rigidity of fibers are also determined. Several important conclusions are made, including that the tensile and compressive prestress strains, respectively, increase and decrease the initial network shear stiffness but have no effect on the maximal shear modulus. We discuss the findings in terms of microstructural properties such as the local strain energy distribution.

Indexed as

CytoskeletonExtracellular MatrixStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID33412143
PMCPMC7896105
OpenAlexW3118806166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.