Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33412102›Full record

ArticleBiochemical pharmacology2021

Modulation of recognition memory performance by light and its relationship with cortical EEG theta and gamma activities.

Sibah Hasan, Shu K E Tam, Russell G Foster, Vladyslav V Vyazovskiy, David M Bannerman, Stuart N Peirson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sibah HasanSleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute (SCNi), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Neuro-Bio Ltd., Abingdon, United Kingdom. Electronic address: sibah.hasan@gmail.com.
Shu K E TamSleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute (SCNi), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Russell G FosterSleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute (SCNi), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Vladyslav V VyazovskiySleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute (SCNi), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
David M BannermanBehavioural Neuroscience Unit, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stuart N PeirsonSleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute (SCNi), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: stuart.peirson@eye.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBNeurosciences Institute · USOxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I021086/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S015817/1Medical Research Council MR/L003635/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098461/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute exposure to light exerts widespread effects on physiology, in addition to its key role in photoentrainment. Although the modulatory effect of light on physiological arousal is well demonstrated in mice, its effect on memory performance is inconclusive, as the direction of the effect depends on the nature of the behavioural task employed and/or the type of stimulus utilised. Moreover, in all rodent studies that reported significant effects of light on performance, brain activity was not assessed during the task and thus it is unclear how brain activity was modulated by light or the exact relationship between light-modulated brain activity and performance. Here we examine the modulatory effects of light of varying intensities on recognition memory performance and frontoparietal waking electroencephalography (EEG) in mice using the spontaneous recognition memory task. We report a light-intensity-dependent disruptive effect on recognition memory performance at the group level, but inspection of individual-level data indicates that light-intensity-dependent facilitation is observed in some cases. Using linear mixed-effects models, we then demonstrate that EEG fast theta (θ) activity at the time of encoding negatively predicts recognition memory performance, whereas slow gamma (γ) activity at the time of retrieval positively predicts performance. These relationships between θ/γ activity and performance are strengthened by increasing light intensity. Thus, light modulates θ and γ band activities involved in attentional and mnemonic processes, thereby affecting recognition memory performance. However, extraneous factors including the phase of the internal clock at which light is presented and homeostatic sleep pressure may determine how photic input is translated into behavioural performance.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainElectroencephalographyGamma RhythmMaleMemoryMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOdorantsPhotic StimulationRecognition, PsychologySmellTheta RhythmEEG gammaEEG thetaLight intensityMiceRecognition memory performance

Identifiers

PMID33412102
PMCPMC8363935
OpenAlexW3119736944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.