ArticleEuropean cells & materials2021
Long term outcomes of biomaterial-mediated repair of focal cartilage defects in a large animal model.
Article in European cells & materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative Technologies for Articular Cartilage Repair: Research, Development, and Clinical Translation-A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Minipig costal and knee cartilage structure-function relationships and their use as cell sources for tissue-engineered analogous cellular products for cartilage repair.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- 3D bio-printed scaffolds and smart implants: evaluating functional performance in animal surgery models.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- A Photopolymerizable Biocompatible Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Promotes Early Articular Cartilage Repair in a Minipig Model In Vivo.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Multiphasic scaffolds for the repair of osteochondral defects: Outcomes of preclinical studies.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Modulating design parameters to drive cell invasion into hydrogels for osteochondral tissue formation.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation of surgical fixation methods for the implantation of melt electrowriting-reinforced hyaluronic acid hydrogel composites in porcine cartilage defects.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Cartilage Tissue Engineering: An Introduction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Within or Without You? A Perspective Comparing In Situ and Ex Situ Tissue Engineering Strategies for Articular Cartilage Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Navigating regulatory pathways for translation of biologic cartilage repair products.Science translational medicine · 2022Review
- Gravity-based patterning of osteogenic factors to preserve bone structure after osteochondral injury in a large animal model.Biofabrication · 2022Article
- Marked differences in local bone remodelling in response to different marrow stimulation techniques in a large animal.European cells & materials · 2021Article
- Targeting the reorganization of F-actin for cell-based implantation cartilage repair therapies.Differentiation; research in biological diversityReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The repair of focal cartilage defects remains one of the foremost issues in the field of orthopaedics. Chondral defects may arise from a variety of joint pathologies and left untreated, will likely progress to osteoarthritis. Current repair techniques, such as microfracture, result in short-term clinical improvements but have poor long-term outcomes. Emerging scaffold-based repair strategies have reported superior outcomes compared to microfracture and motivate the development of new biomaterials for this purpose. In this study, unique composite implants consisting of a base porous reinforcing component (woven poly(ε-caprolactone)) infiltrated with 1 of 2 hydrogels (self-assembling peptide or thermo-gelling hyaluronan) or bone marrow aspirate were evaluated. The objective was to evaluate cartilage repair with composite scaffold treatment compared to the current standard of care (microfracture) in a translationally relevant large animal model, the Yucatan minipig. While many cartilage-repair studies have shown some success in vivo, most are short term and not clinically relevant. Informed by promising 6-week findings, a 12-month study was carried out and those results are presented here. To aid in comparisons across platforms, several structural and functionally relevant outcome measures were performed. Despite positive early findings, the long-term results indicated less than optimal structural and mechanical results with respect to cartilage repair, with all treatment groups performing worse than the standard of care. This study is important in that it brings much needed attention to the importance of performing translationally relevant long-term studies in an appropriate animal model when developing new clinical cartilage repair approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.