Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411938›Full record

ArticleEuropean cells & materials2021

Long term outcomes of biomaterial-mediated repair of focal cartilage defects in a large animal model.

M L Sennett, J M Friedman, B S Ashley, B D Stoeckl, J M Patel, M Alini, M Cucchiarini, D Eglin, H Madry, A Mata and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European cells & materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cartilage Tissue Engineering: An Introduction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

M L Sennett
J M Friedman
B S Ashley
B D Stoeckl
J M Patel
M Alini
M Cucchiarini
D Eglin
H Madry
A Mata
C Semino
M J Stoddart
B Johnstone
F T Moutos
B T Estes
F Guilak
R L Mauck *
G R Dodge *79A Stemmler Hall, 36th Street and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6081, USA.gdodge@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
AO Foundation · CHPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USCytex Therapeutics (United States) · USPhiladelphia University · USUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Overall: Resource-based Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders Research (Overall Application)P30AR069619 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LOUIS J SOSLOWSKY · 2016 to 2026
$9.1M
Resource Based Center for Musculoskeletal Biology and Medicine (Overall Application)P30AR074992 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEW J SILVA · 2019 to 2026
$6.8M
Cartilage response to compression injury: A platform for therapeutics discoveryI01RX001213 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DODGE, GEORGE R. · 2014 to 2020
–
Medical Research Council MR/R015651/1NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069619NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR074992RRD VA I01 RX001213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repair of focal cartilage defects remains one of the foremost issues in the field of orthopaedics. Chondral defects may arise from a variety of joint pathologies and left untreated, will likely progress to osteoarthritis. Current repair techniques, such as microfracture, result in short-term clinical improvements but have poor long-term outcomes. Emerging scaffold-based repair strategies have reported superior outcomes compared to microfracture and motivate the development of new biomaterials for this purpose. In this study, unique composite implants consisting of a base porous reinforcing component (woven poly(ε-caprolactone)) infiltrated with 1 of 2 hydrogels (self-assembling peptide or thermo-gelling hyaluronan) or bone marrow aspirate were evaluated. The objective was to evaluate cartilage repair with composite scaffold treatment compared to the current standard of care (microfracture) in a translationally relevant large animal model, the Yucatan minipig. While many cartilage-repair studies have shown some success in vivo, most are short term and not clinically relevant. Informed by promising 6-week findings, a 12-month study was carried out and those results are presented here. To aid in comparisons across platforms, several structural and functionally relevant outcome measures were performed. Despite positive early findings, the long-term results indicated less than optimal structural and mechanical results with respect to cartilage repair, with all treatment groups performing worse than the standard of care. This study is important in that it brings much needed attention to the importance of performing translationally relevant long-term studies in an appropriate animal model when developing new clinical cartilage repair approaches.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDisease Models, AnimalHyaluronic AcidSwineSwine, MiniatureBiocompatible MaterialsHyaluronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID33411938
PMCPMC8626827
OpenAlexW3120610046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.