Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411812›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Psychological impacts from COVID-19 among university students: Risk factors across seven states in the United States.

Matthew H E M Browning, Lincoln R Larson, Iryna Sharaievska, Alessandro Rigolon, Olivia McAnirlin, Lauren Mullenbach, Scott Cloutier, Tue M Vu, Jennifer Thomsen, Nathan Reigner and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 280 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
280citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
123.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

280 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 902 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

220 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew H E M BrowningVirtual Reality & Nature Lab, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2296-7602
Lincoln R LarsonDepartment of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9591-1269
Iryna SharaievskaDepartment of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States of America.
Alessandro RigolonDepartment of City and Metropolitan Planning, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Olivia McAnirlinVirtual Reality & Nature Lab, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States of America.
Lauren MullenbachDepartment of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1258-7983
Scott CloutierSustainability and Happiness Research Lab, School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America.
Tue M VuAdvanced Computing & Data Science, Clemson Computing & Information Technology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States of America.
Jennifer ThomsenDepartment of Society and Conservation, W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States of America.
Nathan ReignerRecreation, Park, and Tourism Management Department, College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University, PA, United States of America.
Elizabeth Covelli MetcalfDepartment of Society and Conservation, W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States of America.
Ashley D'AntonioForest Ecosystems and Society, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Marco HelbichDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0392-8915
Gregory N BratmanEnvironment & Well-Being Lab, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Hector Olvera AlvarezSchool of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America.
Clemson University · USNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of Montana · USArizona State University · USOregon Health & Science University · USOregon State University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Washington · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversity students are increasingly recognized as a vulnerable population, suffering from higher levels of anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and disordered eating compared to the general population. Therefore, when the nature of their educational experience radically changes-such as sheltering in place during the COVID-19 pandemic-the burden on the mental health of this vulnerable population is amplified. The objectives of this study are to 1) identify the array of psychological impacts COVID-19 has on students, 2) develop profiles to characterize students' anticipated levels of psychological impact during the pandemic, and 3) evaluate potential sociodemographic, lifestyle-related, and awareness of people infected with COVID-19 risk factors that could make students more likely to experience these impacts.

methodsCross-sectional data were collected through web-based questionnaires from seven U.S. universities. Representative and convenience sampling was used to invite students to complete the questionnaires in mid-March to early-May 2020, when most coronavirus-related sheltering in place orders were in effect. We received 2,534 completed responses, of which 61% were from women, 79% from non-Hispanic Whites, and 20% from graduate students.

resultsExploratory factor analysis on close-ended responses resulted in two latent constructs, which we used to identify profiles of students with latent profile analysis, including high (45% of sample), moderate (40%), and low (14%) levels of psychological impact. Bivariate associations showed students who were women, were non-Hispanic Asian, in fair/poor health, of below-average relative family income, or who knew someone infected with COVID-19 experienced higher levels of psychological impact. Students who were non-Hispanic White, above-average social class, spent at least two hours outside, or less than eight hours on electronic screens were likely to experience lower levels of psychological impact. Multivariate modeling (mixed-effects logistic regression) showed that being a woman, having fair/poor general health status, being 18 to 24 years old, spending 8 or more hours on screens daily, and knowing someone infected predicted higher levels of psychological impact when risk factors were considered simultaneously.

conclusionInadequate efforts to recognize and address college students' mental health challenges, especially during a pandemic, could have long-term consequences on their health and education.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdultCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSocial FactorsStudentsUnited StatesUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33411812
PMCPMC7790395
OpenAlexW3118613563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.