Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411731›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Lassa viral dynamics in non-human primates treated with favipiravir or ribavirin.

Guillaume Lingas, Kyle Rosenke, David Safronetz, Jérémie Guedj

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Preparing for the next viral threat with broad-spectrum antivirals.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Lassa Virus Countermeasures.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Lassa Virus Treatment Options.Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Guillaume LingasUniversité de Paris, IAME, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8566-6220
Kyle RosenkeLaboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, Hamilton, Montana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8101-4348
David SafronetzDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Jérémie GuedjUniversité de Paris, IAME, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5534-5482
Inserm · FRNational Institutes of Health · USPublic Health Agency of Canada · CA

Funding

Mali International Center for Excellence in ResearchZIAAI001189 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI FELDMANN, HEINRICH · 2014 to 2025
$3.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lassa fever is an haemorrhagic fever caused by Lassa virus (LASV). There is no vaccine approved against LASV and the only recommended antiviral treatment relies on ribavirin, despite limited evidence of efficacy. Recently, the nucleotide analogue favipiravir showed a high antiviral efficacy, with 100% survival obtained in an otherwise fully lethal non-human primate (NHP) model of Lassa fever. However the mechanism of action of the drug is not known and the absence of pharmacokinetic data limits the translation of these results to the human setting. Here we aimed to better understand the antiviral effect of favipiravir by developping the first mathematical model recapitulating Lassa viral dynamics and treatment. We analyzed the viral dynamics in 24 NHPs left untreated or treated with ribavirin or favipiravir, and we put the results in perspective with those obtained with the same drugs in the context of Ebola infection. Our model estimates favipiravir EC50 in vivo to 2.89 μg.mL-1, which is much lower than what was found against Ebola virus. The main mechanism of action of favipiravir was to decrease virus infectivity, with an efficacy of 91% at the highest dose. Based on our knowledge acquired on the drug pharmacokinetics in humans, our model predicts that favipiravir doses larger than 1200 mg twice a day should have the capability to strongly reduce the production infectious virus and provide a milestone towards a future use in humans.

Indexed as

AmidesAntiviral AgentsLassa virusPyrazinesRibavirinAnimalsFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsLassa FeverMacaca fascicularisModels, BiologicalViral LoadAmidesAntiviral AgentsfavipiravirPyrazinesRibavirin

Identifiers

PMID33411731
PMCPMC7817048
OpenAlexW3120104026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.