Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411574›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2021

Impact of Patients' Companions on Clinical Encounters Between Black Patients and Their Non-Black Oncologists.

Amy K Otto, Maija Reblin, Felicity W K Harper, Lauren M Hamel, Tanina F Moore, Lee Ellington, Susan Eggly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Talking with clinicians about online cancer information: a survey of cancer patients and surrogate information seekers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Survivorship Care of Older Adults With Cancer: Priority Areas for Clinical Practice, Training, Research, and Policy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy K OttoDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0003-3712-6435
Maija ReblinDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-465X
Felicity W K HarperDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-8646-9066
Lauren M HamelDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-8910-7079
Tanina F MooreDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.ORCID 0000-0003-0232-348X
Lee EllingtonCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Susan EgglyDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-8137-6098

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie Lynn Boerner · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
Southeast Michigan Community Network ProgramU54CA153606 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBRECHT, TERRANCE L · 2010 to 2015
$4.2M
Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentT32CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI Vani N Simmons, SUSAN T VADAPARAMPIL · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090314NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe presence of caregivers or companions during clinical encounters influences the dynamics and outcomes of the encounters. Most prior studies of companions in clinical encounters focus on non-Hispanic White patients. However, there is generally lower-quality patient-physician communication during encounters with Black patients; these communication differences may contribute to racial health disparities. The purpose of the present study was to examine effects of the presence and active participation of companions on encounters between Black patients with cancer and non-Black oncologists.

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of data collected during a larger intervention study. Participants were Black patients with breast, colon, or lung cancer who had a treatment-discussion encounter with a participating non-Black medical oncologist. Video recordings of encounters were coded for patient, companion, and oncologist communication. After the encounter, patients reported perceptions of the recommended treatment; patients and oncologists reported perceptions of each other.

resultsData from 114 patients and 19 oncologists were included in analyses. Only 47% of patients brought a companion to the encounter. Oncologists spent more time with accompanied Black patients, used more patient-centered communication with them, and perceived them as having more social support compared with unaccompanied Black patients. Oncologists reported that accompanied patients asked more questions. When companions participated more actively in the encounter, oncologists used more patient-centered communication. DISCUSSION: Bringing a companion to oncology appointments may be beneficial to Black patients because oncologists spend more time with patients, use more patient-centered communication, and perceive patients more positively, all of which may ultimately improve patient health and well-being outcomes.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanOncologistsCommunicationFriendsHumansPhysician-Patient Relations

Identifiers

PMID33411574
PMCPMC8258138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.