Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411550›Full record

Trial reportPsychological services2022

Motivational interviewing to reduce risky sexual behaviors among at-risk male youth: A randomized controlled pilot study.

Shayna S Bassett, Daniel J Delaney, Amy M Moore, Mary Clair-Michaud, Jennifer G Clarke, L A R Stein

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological services, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shayna S BassettDepartment of Psychology, Social Sciences Research Center, University of Rhode Island.
Daniel J DelaneyDepartment of Psychology, Social Sciences Research Center, University of Rhode Island.ORCID 0000-0001-6302-2934
Amy M MooreDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island.ORCID 0000-0001-6935-2379
Mary Clair-MichaudThe Rhode Island Training School.
Jennifer G ClarkeCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Alpert Medical School of Brown University.
L A R SteinDepartment of Psychology, Social Sciences Research Center, University of Rhode Island.
University of Rhode Island · USBrown University · USRhode Island School of Design · US

Funding

Contraceptive Awareness and Reproductive EducationR01HD065942 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI STEIN, LYNDA A · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite male youth taking more sexual risks that lead to unwanted partner pregnancy and/or sexually transmitted infections (STIs), research evaluating interventions for risky sex has focused almost exclusively on adolescent and adult females. With STIs among male youth on the rise, behavioral interventions that target risky sex among male youth are needed. PURPOSE: A randomized controlled pilot study was conducted to examine the feasibility and acceptability of two manualized behavioral interventions for sexually active male youth.

methodsSexually active at-risk male youth (N = 27) were recruited and randomized to receive one session of motivational interviewing (MI) or didactic educational counseling (DEC). Assessment interviews were conducted prior to and 3 months following the intervention session.

resultsSupport for the feasibility and acceptability of delivering behavioral interventions to reduce risky sexual behaviors among at-risk male youth was found. Compared to participants in DEC at follow-up, participants in MI reported having significantly fewer sexual encounters with casual partners, used substances at the time of sex significantly less often with all partners and casual partners, and reported fewer incidents of using substances at the time of sex without a condom with all partners. Conversely, participants who received MI used substances at the time of sex with main partners and used substances at the time of sex without a condom more often with main partners at follow-up compared to participants who received DEC.

conclusionsResults of the pilot study support conducting a larger randomized controlled trial to examine treatment effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingAdolescentAdultCondomsFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsPregnancyRisk-TakingSexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID33411550
PMCPMC9069535
OpenAlexW3119098189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.