Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411409›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2020

In vivo characterization of chick embryo mesoderm by optical coherence tomography-assisted microindentation.

Marica Marrese, Nelda Antonovaité, Ben K A Nelemans, Ariana Ahmadzada, Davide Iannuzzi, Theodoor H Smit

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular and Mechanical Cues for Somite Periodicity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  7. In vivo characterization of chick embryo mesoderm by optical coherence tomography-assisted microindentation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marica MarreseDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Laser LaB Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nelda AntonovaitéDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Laser LaB Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ben K A NelemansDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ariana AhmadzadaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Laser LaB Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Davide IannuzziDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Laser LaB Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Theodoor H SmitDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryos are growing organisms with highly heterogeneous properties in space and time. Understanding the mechanical properties is a crucial prerequisite for the investigation of morphogenesis. During the last 10 years, new techniques have been developed to evaluate the mechanical properties of biological tissues in vivo. To address this need, we employed a new instrument that, via the combination of micro-indentation with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), allows us to determine both, the spatial distribution of mechanical properties of chick embryos, and the structural changes in real-time. We report here the stiffness measurements on the live chicken embryo, from the mesenchymal tailbud to the epithelialized somites. The storage modulus of the mesoderm increases from (176 ± 18) Pa in the tail to (716 ± 117) Pa in the somitic region (mean ± SEM, n = 12). The midline has a mean storage modulus of (947 ± 111) Pa in the caudal (PSM) presomitic mesoderm (mean ± SEM, n = 12), indicating a stiff rod along the body axis, which thereby mechanically supports the surrounding tissue. The difference in stiffness between midline and presomitic mesoderm decreases as the mesoderm forms somites. This study provides an efficient method for the biomechanical characterization of soft biological tissues in vivo and shows that the mechanical properties strongly relate to different morphological features of the investigated regions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaChick EmbryoElasticityMesodermTomography, Optical Coherencechicken embryosin vivo mechanical propertiesmicroindentationoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID33411409
PMCPMC7497264
OpenAlexW3044828854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.