Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411250›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Pilot Study of an Encounter Decision Aid for Lung Cancer Screening.

Mayuko Ito Fukunaga, Akshu Balwan, Jaclyn A Janis, Caitlin Gutheil, Jason Yahwak, Paul K J Han

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mayuko Ito FukunagaDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA. Mayuko.ItoFuKunaga@umassmed.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4325-3959
Akshu BalwanDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of New Mexico, 2211 Lomas Blvd, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3132-9349
Jaclyn A JanisCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, 509 Forest Avenue, Suite 200, Portland, ME, 04074, USA.
Caitlin GutheilCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, 509 Forest Avenue, Suite 200, Portland, ME, 04074, USA.
Jason YahwakChest Medicine Associates, 100 Foden Road, South Portland, ME, 04106, USA.
Paul K J HanCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, 509 Forest Avenue, Suite 200, Portland, ME, 04074, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0165-1940
Maine Medical Center · USChest Medicine Associates · USUMass Memorial Health Care · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

K12 Cardiopulmonary Implementation Science Scholars ProgramK12HL138049 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEMON, STEPHENIE C., LINDENAUER, PETER KYLE · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Prevention And Control of Cancer: Training for Change in Individuals and SystemsT32CA172009 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEMON, STEPHENIE C., OCKENE, JUDITH K · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA172009NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL138049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has mandated in-person shared decision-making (SDM) counseling with the use of one or more decision aids (DAs) prior to lung cancer screening. We developed a single-page, paper-based, encounter DA (EDA) to be used within a clinician-patient encounter for lung cancer screening and conducted a pre-post pilot intervention study to evaluate its feasibility and effects on patient decisional conflict. Patients referred to a pulmonary practice-based lung cancer screening program were surveyed before and after an SDM visit with a pulmonologist, who used the EDA to counsel the patient. Patient knowledge of the mortality benefit from screening and the frequency of abnormal screening test results was evaluated after the visit, while decisional conflict was measured before and after the visit using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). Twenty-three patients participated (mean age = 65.8 years; 43% female; mean smoking history = 57.8 pack-years; 48% currently smoking). Following the visit, 28% of participants correctly understood the mortality benefit of lung cancer screening, while 82% understood the frequency of abnormal screening tests. The mean total DCS score decreased from 35.0 to 0.2 after the visit (p < 0.001). These data suggest that a single-page, paper-based EDA is feasible and potentially effective in reducing decision conflict when used within a SDM visit, although more research is needed to establish the independent effects of the EDA, and future efforts to promote SDM may need to devote greater attention to improving patient understanding of the mortality benefit of screening.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsAgedDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMedicarePatient ParticipationPilot ProjectsUnited StatesDecision aidLung cancer screeningShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID33411250
PMCPMC8260603
OpenAlexW3119725824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.