Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411209›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2021

Efficacy and safety of modified FOLFIRINOX as salvage therapy for patients with refractory advanced biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study.

Liu-Fang Ye, Chao Ren, Long Bai, Jie-Ying Liang, Ming-Tao Hu, Hui Yang, Zhi-Qiang Wang, Feng-Hua Wang, Rui-Hua Xu, Yu-Hong Li and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Hyperthermia combined with chemotherapyWorld journal of clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liu-Fang YeState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Chao RenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Long BaiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Jie-Ying LiangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Ming-Tao HuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Hui YangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Qiang WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Feng-Hua WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Rui-Hua XuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Yu-Hong LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
De-Shen WangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. wangdsh@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-9657-4380
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Gemcitabine plus cisplatin is regarded as the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, no standard chemotherapy has yet been recommended after treatment failure. Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) appears to be a better-tolerated regimen, which leads to improved survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer that has histological and molecular similarities with BTC. We assessed the efficacy and safety of mFOLFIRINOX as salvage therapy in advanced BTC patients who were refractory to previous chemotherapy. Methods A total of 15 consecutive patients with documented unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BCT who received the mFOLFIRINOX regimen were included in the study. Patients were intravenously administrated with oxaliplatin (65 mg/m

Indexed as

Salvage TherapyAdministration, IntravenousAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiliary Tract NeoplasmsFemaleFluorouracilHumansIrinotecanKaplan-Meier EstimateLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOxaliplatinAntineoplastic AgentsFluorouracilfolfirinoxIrinotecanLeucovorinOxaliplatinAdvanced biliary tract cancerDose modificationEfficacyFOLFIRINOXSafetySalvage therapy

Identifiers

PMID33411209
OpenAlexW3118440195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.