Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411173›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2021

Performance of VITEK 2, E-test, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, and modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion compared to reference broth microdilution for testing tigecycline susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii in a multicenter study in China.

Dandan Yin, Yan Guo, Min Li, Wenjuan Wu, Jin Tang, Ying Liu, Feng Chen, Yuxing Ni, Jingyong Sun, Hong Zhang and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Cross-Sectional Study to DetermineBioMed research international · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. African journal of laboratory medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance inInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Dandan Yin *Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 M. Wulumuqi Rd., Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Yan Guo *Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 M. Wulumuqi Rd., Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Min LiRenji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Wenjuan WuShanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jin TangSixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ying LiuXinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Feng ChenXinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yuxing NiRuijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Jingyong SunRuijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Hong ZhangChildren's Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Hu ZhaoHuadong hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fupin HuInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 M. Wulumuqi Rd., Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China. hufupin@fudan.edu.cn.
Huashan Hospital · CNRuijin Hospital · CNXinHua Hospital · CNHuadong Hospital · CNRenji Hospital · CNShanghai Children's Hospital · CNShanghai East Hospital · CNShanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tigecycline is an alternative antibiotic for managing carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, disk diffusion and automated testing often show false-intermediate or false-resistant results in tigecycline susceptibility, misleading clinical antimicrobial therapy. Broth microdilution (BMD) is the reference method for testing tigecycline susceptibility, but it is labor intensive and time consuming to perform in clinical laboratories. Therefore, a simple and accurate method is urgently needed. We evaluated the performance of VITEK 2, E-test, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion (KB), and modified KB disk diffusion (mKB) versus BMD in testing tigecycline susceptibility of 372 strains of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and 346 strains of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). BMD confirmed that 96.8% of CRKP and 91% of CRAB strains were susceptible to tigecycline. E-test, VITEK 2, KB, and mKB yielded categorical agreement of 96.7/59.3%, 69.9/54.3%, 78.5/87.3%, and 96.5%/91% for CRKP/CRAB, respectively. No very major error was found for either CRKP or CRAB by any method. No major error was found for CRKP or CRAB by the mKB method. The mKB method enhanced by R-buffer is simple, accurate, and inexpensive for clinical laboratories to test the susceptibility of CRKP and CRAB isolates to tigecycline.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAcinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsChinaDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsHumansKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTigecyclineAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsTigecyclineAntimicrobial susceptibility testingCarbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanniiCarbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniaeCategorical agreementMajor errorModified disk diffusionTigecyclineVery major error

Identifiers

PMID33411173
OpenAlexW3119043475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.