Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411155›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical immunology2021

When Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) with T Cell Receptor Excision Circles Is Not SCID: a Case-Based Review.

David Buchbinder, Jolan E Walter, Manish J Butte, Wan-Yin Chan, Maria Chitty Lopez, Victoria R Dimitriades, Morna J Dorsey, Diane J Nugent, Jennifer M Puck, Jasjit Singh and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reappraisal of Idiopathic CD4 Lymphocytopenia at 30 Years.The New England journal of medicine · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Transient B cell lymphopenia revealed by KRECs newborn screening: Post-screening referral strategies, clinical course, and follow-up.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiencies (SCID) in Germany].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID).The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David BuchbinderDepartment of Hematology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA. dbuchbinder@choc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9470-3473
Jolan E WalterDivision of Pediatric, University of South Florida at Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, Allergy/ Immunology, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Manish J ButteDivision of Immunology, Allergy, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Wan-Yin ChanDepartment of Allergy & Immunology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA.
Maria Chitty LopezDivision of Pediatric, University of South Florida at Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, Allergy/ Immunology, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Victoria R DimitriadesDivision of Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Morna J DorseyDepartment of Allergy & Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Diane J NugentDepartment of Hematology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA.
Jennifer M PuckDepartment of Allergy & Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jasjit SinghDepartment of Infectious Disease, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA.
Cathleen A CollinsDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy Immunology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Children's Hospital of Orange County · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Training of Clinical Investigators in Primary Immune DeficienciesU54AI082973 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALECH, HARRY · 2009 to 2023
$23.3M
Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium Annual Scientific MeetingR13AI094943 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PUCK, JENNIFER M. · 2011 to 2025
$239k
NIAID NIH HHS R13 AI094943NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI082973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn screening efforts focusing on the quantification of T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs), as a biomarker for abnormal thymic production of T cells, have allowed for the identification and definitive treatment of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in asymptomatic neonates. With the adoption of TREC quantification in Guthrie cards across the USA and abroad, typical, and atypical SCID constitutes only ~ 10% of cases identified with abnormal TRECs associated with T cell lymphopenia. Several other non-SCID-related conditions may be identified by newborn screening in a term infant. Thus, it is important for physicians to recognize that other factors, such as prematurity, are often associated with low TRECs initially, but often improve with age. This paper focuses on a challenge that immunologists face: the diagnostic evaluation and management of cases in which abnormal TRECs are associated with variants of T cell lymphopenia in the absence of a genetically defined form of typical or atypical SCID. Various syndromes associated with T cell impairment, secondary forms of T cell lymphopenia, and idiopathic T cell lymphopenia are identified using this screening approach. Yet there is no consensus or guidelines to assist in the evaluation and management of these newborns, despite representing 90% of the patients identified, resulting in significant work for the clinical teams until a diagnosis is made. Using a case-based approach, we review pearls relevant to the evaluation of these newborns, as well as the management dilemmas for the families and team related to the resolution of genetic ambiguities.

Indexed as

HumansInfant, NewbornLymphopeniaNeonatal ScreeningReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyT-LymphocytesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellidiopathic T cell lymphopeniaNewborn screeningsecondary T cell lymphopeniasyndromes associated with T cell lymphopenia

Identifiers

PMID33411155
PMCPMC8179373
OpenAlexW3118789042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.