ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Reproducibility of minor salivary gland biopsy reports in Sjögren's syndrome and its correlation with disease biomarkers.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ophthalmologic and serologic predictors of positive minor salivary gland biopsy in suspected Sjögren's disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
objectiveSjögren's syndrome (SS) is a systemic autoimmune disease that is challenging to diagnose. Although minor salivary gland biopsy (MSGB) is a useful ancillary study, different factors make its interpretation difficult. Also, the significance of distinct histopathological findings is unknown. We aimed to determine the concordance between pathologists and rheumatologists in interpreting the MSGB results, as well as the correlation between MSGB findings, paraclinical features, and SS diagnosis.
methodsThis descriptive retrospective study reviewed medical charts from 998 individuals from a single center where MSGBs had been performed. Rheumatologists interpreted biopsy reports from pathologists, and interobserver variability was calculated. Logistic regression using immunological parameters and histological findings was performed.
resultsWe included 998 patients with a median age of 55 years (45-64 years); the majority of patients were females (n = 934, 93.6%). Chisholm and Mason's scoring system was the most frequently used scale (55.1%). There was a good correlation between pathologists and rheumatologists for diagnosing SS using MSGB findings (Cohen's kappa 0.91). We observed a strong association between interstitial plasmocytes and SS (OR 24, 95% CI 9.09-64.94, p = 0).
conclusionThe MSGB is an essential tool for the diagnosis of SS. Although different factors may negatively affect its reproducibility, histological findings, such as interstitial plasmocytes, may predict the risk of developing SS. Key Points • We provide information based on 998 patients with suspected SS diagnosis. • Chisholm and Mason's scale is the most frequently used compared to Greenspan's and Tarpley's scales. • There is good correlation between pathologists and rheumatologists for the diagnosis of SS using MSGB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.