Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411130›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2021

Comparative study of treatment for striae alba stage striae gravidarum: 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser versus fractional microneedle radiofrequency.

Zhaoyang Tang, Shuheng Wen, Taoming Liu, Aijiao Yu, Yuanhong Li

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in the Treatment of Striae Distensae.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. New Progress in Therapeutic Modalities of Striae Distensae.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhaoyang TangDepartment of Dermatology, Capital Medical University Electric Power Teaching Hospital, Beijing, 100073, People's Republic of China.
Shuheng WenDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Taoming LiuDepartment of Dermatology, No. 1 Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155, Nanjing Street, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Aijiao YuDepartment of Dermatology, No. 1 Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155, Nanjing Street, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Yuanhong LiDepartment of Dermatology, No. 1 Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155, Nanjing Street, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China. liyuanhong@vip.sina.com.
China Medical University · CNCapital Medical University · CNTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Striae gravidarum is a common dermatologic condition for females caused by multiple factors during pregnancy. It remains a therapeutic challenge especially in the striae alba (SA) stage, generating psychological and emotional distress to those affected. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) and fractional microneedle radiofrequency (MRF) for treatment of SA striae gravidarum. Fourteen Chinese women with SA striae gravidarum were included in this study. Patient abdomens were randomly divided into NAFL and MRF treatment sides, treated three times at 6-week intervals. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by subjective (clinical assessments, patient satisfaction rating, adverse effects assessment) assessments and objective (skin melanin index measurement, histological study) assessments. Clinical assessment suggested MRF was more effective (P = 0.0143) for improving the appearance of SA striae gravidarum. Both NAFL and MRF demonstrated effective improvement (P = 0.0082 and P = 0.0158, respectively), with no significant difference according to patient satisfaction ratings and changes in melanin index (P = 0.5900). Both treatments induced limited adverse reactions, but MRF treatment caused significant pain compared with the more moderate NAFL treatment (P = 0.0003). MRF treatment increased neocollagen and elastic fibers more significantly than NAFL, based on histological assessments (P = 0.0298 and P = 0.0048, respectively). MRF treatment improved collagen regeneration in SA striae gravidarum more than NAFL but caused considerable pain during treatment. Corresponding treatment or therapeutic strategies should be applied according to clinical scenario.

Indexed as

Lasers, GasLasers, Solid-StateStriae DistensaeFemaleHumansNeedlesPatient SatisfactionPregnancySkinTreatment OutcomeFractional microneedle radiofrequencyNon-ablative fractional laserStriae distensaeStriae gravidarum

Identifiers

PMID33411130
OpenAlexW3118401728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.