Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411096›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2021

Artificial Pancreas Technology Offers Hope for Childhood Diabetes.

Melissa J Schoelwer, Mark D DeBoer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa J SchoelwerDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology and Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Mark D DeBoerDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology and Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA. deboer@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-591X
University of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHere, we provide a review of recent advancements in closed-loop or automated insulin delivery systems commonly referred to as the "artificial pancreas" (AP) for the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D). RECENT

findingsThe use of hybrid closed-loop devices in children and adolescents with T1D consistently increases time in the target glucose range (70-180 mg/dL) without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. Although hybrid closed-loop systems are able to maintain fairly tight glycemic control overnight, daytime control remains challenging, primarily due to meals and exercise, and careful carbohydrate counting and meal boluses remain essential components of optimal diabetes control. Bihormonal and fully automated AP systems remain investigational at this time. While commercially available hybrid closed-loop AP systems improve glycemic control in children with T1D, more work is needed to achieve a fully automated AP system and decrease the burden of using diabetes technology.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Pancreas, ArtificialAdolescentBlood GlucoseChildHumansInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsTechnologyBlood GlucoseInsulinArtificial pancreasAutomated insulin deliveryClosed-loop controlPediatricType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33411096
OpenAlexW3120538715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.