Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411093›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2021

Conventional and advanced imaging throughout the cycle of care of gliomas.

Gilles Reuter, Martin Moïse, Wolfgang Roll, Didier Martin, Arnaud Lombard, Félix Scholtes, Walter Stummer, Eric Suero Molina

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gilles ReuterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium. gilles.reuter@chuliege.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7484-3110
Martin MoïseDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Wolfgang RollDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Didier MartinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Arnaud LombardDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Félix ScholtesDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Walter StummerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Eric Suero MolinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although imaging of gliomas has evolved tremendously over the last decades, published techniques and protocols are not always implemented into clinical practice. Furthermore, most of the published literature focuses on specific timepoints in glioma management. This article reviews the current literature on conventional and advanced imaging techniques and chronologically outlines their practical relevance for the clinical management of gliomas throughout the cycle of care. Relevant articles were located through the Pubmed/Medline database and included in this review. Interpretation of conventional and advanced imaging techniques is crucial along the entire process of glioma care, from diagnosis to follow-up. In addition to the described currently existing techniques, we expect deep learning or machine learning approaches to assist each step of glioma management through tumor segmentation, radiogenomics, prognostication, and characterization of pseudoprogression. Thorough knowledge of the specific performance, possibilities, and limitations of each imaging modality is key for their adequate use in glioma management.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingGlioblastomaHigh-grade gliomasMagnetic resonance ImagingPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.