ArticleCVIR endovascular2021
A technique for intra-procedural blood velocity quantitation using time-resolved 2D digital subtraction angiography.
Article in CVIR endovascular, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interventional Embolization Under Multifactorial Coupling: Mechanisms of Embolic-Agent Distribution and Feasibility of Closed-Loop Automatic Injection.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Low Post-Stent Placement Iliofemoral Vein Peak Velocity by Doppler Ultrasound: Prognostic Implication for Re-Intervention in Thrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Quantitative 2-Dimensionsal Digital Subtraction Venography for Venous Interventions: Validation in Phantom and In Vivo Porcine Models.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2024Article
- Quantification of Iliac Arterial Blood Velocity in Stenotic Phantom and Porcine Models Using Quantitative Digital Subtraction Angiography.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2024Article
- Interleaved x-ray imaging: A method for simultaneous acquisition of quantitative and diagnostic digital subtraction angiography.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Spatiotemporal frequency domain analysis for blood velocity measurement during embolization procedures.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Motion-compensation approach for quantitative digital subtraction angiography and its effect onJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- In silico simulation of hepatic arteries: An open-source algorithm for efficient synthetic data generation.Medical physics · 2023Article
- 2D-perfusion angiography for intra-procedural endovascular treatment response assessment in chronic mesenteric ischemia: a feasibility study.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is utilized qualitatively to assess blood velocity changes that occur during arterial interventions. Quantitative angiographic metrics, such as blood velocity, could be used to standardize endpoints during angiographic interventions. PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy and precision of a quantitative 2D DSA (qDSA) technique and to determine its feasibility for in vivo measurements of blood velocity. MATERIALS AND
methodsA quantitative DSA technique was developed to calculate intra-procedural blood velocity. In vitro validation was performed by comparing velocities from the qDSA method and an ultrasonic flow probe in a bifurcation phantom. Parameters of interest included baseline flow rate, contrast injection rate, projection angle, and magnification. In vivo qDSA analysis was completed in five different branches of the abdominal aorta in two 50 kg swine and compared to 4D Flow MRI. Linear regression, Bland-Altman, Pearson's correlation coefficient and chi squared tests were used to assess the accuracy and precision of the technique.
resultsIn vitro validation showed strong correlation between qDSA and flow probe velocities over a range of contrast injection and baseline flow rates (slope = 1.012, 95% CI [0.989,1.035], Pearson's r = 0.996, p < .0001). The application of projection angle and magnification corrections decreased variance to less than 5% the average baseline velocity (p = 0.999 and p = 0.956, respectively). In vivo validation showed strong correlation with a small bias between qDSA and 4D Flow MRI velocities for all five abdominopelvic arterial vessels of interest (slope = 1.01, Pearson's r = 0.880, p = <.01, Bias = 0.117 cm/s).
conclusionThe proposed method allows for accurate and precise calculation of blood velocities, in near real-time, from time resolved 2D DSAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.