Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33411069›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2021

Acute kidney injury and aging.

Monica Chang-Panesso

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Aging Kidney and Acute Kidney Injury.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monica Chang-PanessoDivision of Nephrology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. mchang-panesso@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1624-4993
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Tubular senescence and proliferative capacity of the aging kidneyK08DK122124 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG-PANESSO, MONICA · 2020 to 2024
$753k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK122124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aging population is growing and developing treatments for age-related diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease has taken on an increasing urgency and is accompanied by high public awareness. The already high and rising incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in the elderly, however, has received relatively little attention despite the potentially fatal outcomes associated with an episode of AKI in this age group. When discussing AKI and aging, one should consider two aspects: first, elderly patients have an increased susceptibility to an AKI episode, and second, they have decreased kidney repair after AKI given the high incidence of progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear if the same factors that drive the increased susceptibility to AKI could be playing a role in the decreased repair capacity or if they are totally different and unrelated. This review will examine current knowledge on the risk factors for the increased susceptibility to AKI in the elderly and will also explore potential aspects that might contribute to a decreased kidney repair response in this age group.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedAgingDisease ProgressionHumansKidneyRisk FactorsAcute kidney injuryAgingChronic kidney diseaseElderlyRenal agingSenescence

Identifiers

PMID33411069
PMCPMC8260619
OpenAlexW3119243344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.