ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Noninvasive diagnosis of portal hypertension using gadoxetate DCE-MRI of the liver and spleen.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative MRI to Assess Portal Pressure in Patients With Liver Disease: Validation at 3 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Splanchnic hemodynamic parameters measured with 4D flow MRI can diagnose severe portal hypertension.European radiology · 2026Article
- Portal vein computed tomography imaging characteristics and their relationship with bleeding risk in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing interventional therapy.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Value for combination of TZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023Article
- Performance of native and gadoxetate-enhanced liver and spleen TAbdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- Bibliometric-analysis visualization and review of non-invasive methods for monitoring and managing the portal hypertension.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion quantification in hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine.European radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the performance of gadoxetate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of the liver and spleen for noninvasive diagnosis of portal hypertension (PH).
methodsThirty-five patients (M/F 22/13, mean age 55 years) with chronic liver disease who underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements were prospectively enrolled in this IRB-approved study. All patients underwent multiparametric MRI including gadoxetate DCE-MRI acquisition. Model-based and model-free DCE-MRI analyses were performed. The correlation between DCE-MRI parameters and HVPG was assessed. ROC analysis was employed to determine the diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI parameters alone and in combination for prediction of PH and clinically significant (CS)PH (HVPG > 5 and ≥ 10 mmHg, respectively).
resultsMean HVPG was 7.0 ± 5.0 mmHg (range 0-18 mmHg). Twenty-one (60%) patients had PH, of whom 9 had CSPH. Modeled liver uptake fraction f
conclusionsOur results demonstrate the potential utility of hepatocyte uptake parameters and spleen interstitial fraction obtained with gadoxetate DCE-MRI for the diagnosis of PH and CSPH. KEY POINTS: • Liver uptake and spleen interstitial fraction estimates from gadoxetate DCE-MRI are significantly correlated with portal pressure measurements. • Liver uptake rate shows good diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of portal hypertension. • The combination of liver uptake rate with spleen interstitial fraction exhibits excellent diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.