Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33410948›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2021

Feasibility of generalised diffusion kurtosis imaging approach for brain glioma grading.

E L Pogosbekian, I N Pronin, N E Zakharova, A I Batalov, A M Turkin, T A Konakova, I I Maximov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E L PogosbekianNeuroimaging Department, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Centre of Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russian Federation.
I N ProninNeuroimaging Department, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Centre of Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russian Federation.
N E ZakharovaNeuroimaging Department, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Centre of Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russian Federation.
A I BatalovNeuroimaging Department, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Centre of Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russian Federation.
A M TurkinNeuroimaging Department, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Centre of Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russian Federation.
T A KonakovaNeuroimaging Department, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Centre of Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russian Federation.
I I MaximovDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. ivan.maximov@psykologi.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-6774
Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute · RUOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 249795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn accurate differentiation of brain glioma grade constitutes an important clinical issue. Powerful non-invasive approach based on diffusion MRI has already demonstrated its feasibility in glioma grade stratification. However, the conventional diffusion tensor (DTI) and kurtosis imaging (DKI) demonstrated moderate sensitivity and performance in glioma grading. In the present work, we apply generalised DKI (gDKI) approach in order to assess its diagnostic accuracy and potential application in glioma grading.

methodsDiffusion scalar metrics were obtained from 50 patients with different glioma grades confirmed by histological tests following biopsy or surgery. All patients were divided into two groups with low- and high-grade gliomas as grade II versus grades III and IV, respectively. For a comparison, trained radiologists segmented the brain tissue into three regions with solid tumour, oedema, and normal appearing white matter. For each region, we estimated the conventional and gDKI metrics including DTI maps.

resultsWe found high correlations between DKI and gDKI metrics in high-grade glioma. Further, gDKI metrics enabled introduction of a complementary measure for glioma differentiation based on correlations between the conventional and generalised approaches. Both conventional and generalised DKI metrics showed quantitative maps of tumour heterogeneity and oedema behaviour. gDKI approach demonstrated largely similar sensitivity and specificity in low-high glioma differentiation as in the case of conventional DKI method.

conclusionThe generalised diffusion kurtosis imaging enables differentiation of low- and high-grade gliomas at the same level as the conventional DKI. Additionally, gDKI exhibited higher sensitivity to tumour heterogeneity and tissue contrast between tumour and healthy tissue and, thus, may contribute as a complementary source of information on tumour differentiation.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFeasibility StudiesHumansNeoplasm GradingDiffusion kurtosis imagingGlioblastomaGlioma discrimination

Identifiers

PMID33410948
PMCPMC8295088
OpenAlexW3118341871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.