ArticleJournal of vision2021
Regression-based analysis of combined EEG and eye-tracking data: Theory and applications.
Article in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- During natural vision, semantic novelty modulates fixation-related processing in primate cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Advantages and artifacts of high-speed OLED monitors for vision, eye-tracking, and EEG research.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- GACNet: A graph attention-based neural network for electroencephalography localization via contrastive learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Misinterpreting Electrophysiology in Human Cognitive Neuroscience.Psychophysiology · 2026Review
- Bridging cognition and control through passive eye movement integration in motor imagery brain-computer interfaces.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Co-Registration of EEG and Eye-Tracking in Psycholinguistics and Bilingualism Research.Frontiers in language sciences · 2026Article
- Mapping neural activity during naturalistic visual and memory search.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neural correlates in the time course of inferences: costs and benefits for less-skilled readers at the university level.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- No Unique Magnocellular Facilitation in Parafoveal Processing: A Combined EEG and Eye Tracking Study.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- How the Dominant Reading Direction Changes Parafoveal Processing: A Combined EEG/Eye-Tracking Study.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Continuous psychophysics: past, present, future.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- Neural mechanism underlying preview effects and masked priming effects in visual word processing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Brain responses vary in duration-modeling strategies and challenges.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Fixation-related potentials during a virtual navigation task: The influence of image statistics on early cortical processing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Refixation behavior in naturalistic viewing: Methods, mechanisms, and neural correlates.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Review
- Synchronization-based fusion of EEG and eye blink signals for enhanced decoding accuracy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- DERCo: A Dataset for Human Behaviour in Reading Comprehension Using EEG.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Do Miniature Eye Movements Affect Neurofeedback Training Performance? A Combined EEG-Eye Tracking Study.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2024Article
- Language prediction in monolingual and bilingual speakers: an EEG study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fixation-related potentials (FRPs), neural responses aligned to the end of saccades, are a promising tool for studying the dynamics of attention and cognition under natural viewing conditions. In the past, four methodological problems have complicated the analysis of such combined eye-tracking/electroencephalogram experiments: (1) the synchronization of data streams, (2) the removal of ocular artifacts, (3) the condition-specific temporal overlap between the brain responses evoked by consecutive fixations, and (4) the fact that numerous low-level stimulus and saccade properties also influence the postsaccadic neural responses. Although effective solutions exist for the first two problems, the latter two are only beginning to be addressed. In the current paper, we present and review a unified regression-based framework for FRP analysis that allows us to deconvolve overlapping potentials while also controlling for both linear and nonlinear confounds on the FRP waveform. An open software implementation is provided for all procedures. We then demonstrate the advantages of this proposed (non)linear deconvolution modeling approach for data from three commonly studied paradigms: face perception, scene viewing, and reading. First, for a traditional event-related potential (ERP) face recognition experiment, we show how this technique can separate stimulus ERPs from overlapping muscle and brain potentials produced by small (micro)saccades on the face. Second, in natural scene viewing, we model and isolate multiple nonlinear effects of saccade parameters on the FRP. Finally, for a natural sentence reading experiment using the boundary paradigm, we show how it is possible to study the neural correlates of parafoveal preview after removing spurious overlap effects caused by the associated difference in average fixation time. Our results suggest a principal way of measuring reliable eye movement-related brain activity during natural vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.