Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33410738›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2021

Caught in the net: Characterizing how testicular cancer patients use the internet as an information source.

Sarah Yeo, Bernhard Eigl, Sherry Chan, Christian Kollmannsberger, Paris-Ann Ingledew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Viral Disease Goes Viral: Characterizing How Cancer Patients Use Internet Resources for COVID-19 Information.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  2. Reasons behind the Delayed Diagnosis of Testicular Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah YeoUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bernhard EiglBC Cancer Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sherry ChanBC Cancer Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Christian KollmannsbergerBC Cancer Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Paris-Ann IngledewBC Cancer Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver 70% of Canadians who use the internet search for healthcare information online. This is especially true regarding the young adult population. Testicular cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men aged 15-29. This study characterizes how testicular cancer patients access healthcare information online, and how this influences their clinical encounters and treatment decisions.

methodsFrom June 2018 to January 2019, a survey consisting of 24 open- and close-ended questions was distributed to testicular cancer patients at a tertiary cancer center. Survey results were evaluated using mixed methods analysis.

resultsFifty-nine surveys were distributed and 44 responses were received. All respondents used the internet regularly and 82% used the internet as a source of information regarding their cancer. The majority followed top hits from Google when selecting websites to view. Frequent topics searched included treatment details and survivorship concerns. Eighty-nine percent of users found online information easy to understand and 94% found it increased their understanding. For 47% of users, the internet did not influence their clinical consultation nor their treatment decision (53%).

conclusionsMost testicular cancer patients in this study are regular internet users and use the internet to search for testicular cancer information. Healthcare providers should recognize this, and can play important roles in discussing online findings with patients to assess their background knowledge and expectations, as well as providing guidance on selecting credible online resources. The results of this study can be used to improve patient-physician communication and education.

Identifiers

PMID33410738
PMCPMC8418262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.