Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33410549›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics2021

Enhanced external counterpulsation: A unique treatment for the "No-Option" refractory angina patient.

Jose Caceres, Patricia Atal, Rohit Arora, Derek Yee

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Enhanced External Counterpulsation Outcomes Study: Retrospective Analyses of Data Obtained from Patients at a Single Medical Center in United States.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Myocardial strain and refractory angina: an intriguing puzzle.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jose CaceresBuena Park Heart Center, 8585 Knott Ave, #101, Buena Park, CA, 90620, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8618-7731
Patricia AtalBuena Park Heart Center, 8585 Knott Ave, #101, Buena Park, CA, 90620, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1940-8079
Rohit AroraCampbell University School of Medicine, 4350 US-421, Lillington, NC, 27546, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4843-7303
Derek YeeBuena Park Heart Center, 8585 Knott Ave, #101, Buena Park, CA, 90620, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-303X
Buena Vista University · USCampbell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND

objectivesCoronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. For patients on whom guideline-driven measures have been tried, enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is the only truly noninvasive and safe intervention for which a reduction of angina symptoms and nitrate use, increased exercise tolerance, and improvement in myocardial ischaemia have been shown. The objective of this study was to demonstrate, by way of literature review, the efficacy of EECP as a treatment modality for the relief of refractory angina and improvement in quality of life in CAD patients.

methodsThis article reviewed the safety and efficacy of EECP in patients with refractory angina, by conducting a sweeping search and analysis of existing published literature. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Critical review of a multitude of studies revealed that EECP consistently reduces angina pectoris, extends time to exercise-induced ischaemia, decreases dependency on nitroglycerine for frequent chest pain, increases maximum workload, and improves the quality of life in patients with symptomatic stable angina. The literature reviewed also indicated that EECP is well-tolerated by the vast majority of patients, with relatively few adverse events reported.

conclusionThe present study suggests that EECP is a safe and likely best available method of treatment for patients presenting with symptomatic CAD not amenable to further revascularization.

Indexed as

Angina PectorisCounterpulsationExercise ToleranceHumansNitratesProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexNitratesangina pectoriscoronary artery diseaseEECP

Identifiers

PMID33410549
PMCPMC7986429
OpenAlexW3119034490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.