ArticleESC heart failure2021
Combination of ivabradine and sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07341893 (Clinical Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety Sacubitril-valsartan in Patients With Heart Failure.), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety Sacubitril-valsartan in Patients With Heart Failure.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan combined with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after reperfusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Personalized management of angina and heart failure in clinical practice in the Middle East: a narrative review.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Review
- Effects of sacubitril/valsartan combined with ivabradine in treating cardiorenal syndrome.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Heart Rate Reduction and the Prognosis of Heart Failure Focused on Ivabradine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Effectiveness and safety of ivabradine in Chinese patients with chronic heart failure: an observational study.ESC heart failure · 2024Observational
- Cardiac reverse remodelling by imaging parameters with recent changes to guideline medical therapy in heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2023Review
- Ivabradine in patients with heart failure: a systematic literature review.Journal of market access & health policy · 2023Article
- Utility of PREDICT-HF score in high-risk Asian heart failure patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- The association between ivabradine and adverse cardiovascular events in acute decompensated HFrEF patients.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Treatment with angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor for Taiwan heart failure patients: Rationale and baseline characteristics of the TAROT-HF study.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021Observational
- Combination of ivabradine and sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsIvabradine and sacubitril/valsartan are second-line therapies for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) based on guideline recommendations. We aimed to evaluate the synergistic effects of these two medications. METHODS AND
resultsPatients' data were extracted from a multicentre database between 2016 and 2018. Patients were classified into (1) Simultaneous group: simultaneous prescription of ivabradine and sacubitril/valsartan within 6 weeks; (2A) Sequential group, ivabradine-first: ivabradine was prescribed first, followed by sacubitril/valsartan; and (2B) Sequential group, sacubitril/valsartan-first: sacubitril/valsartan was prescribed first, followed by ivabradine. A total of 464 patients with HFrEF were enrolled. Cardiovascular death and/or unplanned re-hospitalizations for HF were less frequent (28.6% vs. 44.8%, P = 0.01), and the improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly greater in patients from the Simultaneous group than those from the Sequential group (∆LVEF 12.8 ± 12.9% vs. 9.3 ± 12.6%, P = 0.007). Among Sequential subgroups, the ivabradine-first treatment decreased heart rate and increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared with sacubitril/valsartan-first treatment (∆heart rate -9.1 ± 12.9 b.p.m. vs. 2.6 ± 16.0 b.p.m., P < 0.001; ∆SBP 4.6 ± 16.5 mmHg vs. -4.8 ± 17.2 mmHg, P < 0.001), whereas sacubitril/valsartan-first treatment showed a higher degree of LVEF improvement (∆LVEF 3.6 ± 7.8% vs. 0.7 ± 7.7%, P = 0.002) than ivabradine-first treatment. At the end of follow-up, SBP, LVEF, and left ventricular volume were comparable between two Sequential subgroups.
conclusionsAmong patients with HFrEF, simultaneous rather than sequential treatment with sacubitril/valsartan and ivabradine was a better strategy to reduce adverse events and achieve left ventricular reverse remodelling. Ivabradine treatment had a more significant benefit on improving haemodynamic stability, whereas sacubitril/valsartan treatment showed a more significant effect on improving LVEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.