Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33410197›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2021

A depth-based global envelope test for comparing two groups of functions with applications to biomedical data.

Sara Lopez-Pintado, Kun Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara Lopez-PintadoDepartment of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3234-5359
Kun QianDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Nonparametric depth-based methods for analyzing high-dimensional data. Applications to biomedical researchR21MH120534 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LOPEZ-PINTADO, SARA · 2019 to 2020
$450k
NIMH NIH HHS 1R21 MH120534-01NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH120534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional data are commonly observed in many emerging biomedical fields and their analysis is an exciting developing area in statistics. Numerous statistical methods, such as principal components, analysis of variance, and linear regression, have been extended to functional data. The statistical analysis of functions can be significantly improved using nonparametric and robust estimators. New ideas of depth for functional data have been proposed in recent years and can be extended to image data. They provide a way of ordering curves or images from center-outward, and of defining robust order statistics in a functional context. In this paper we develop depth-based global envelope tests for comparing two groups of functions or images. In addition to providing global P-values, the proposed envelope test can be displayed graphically and indicates the specific portion(s) of the functional data (eg, in pixels or in time) that may have led to rejection of the null hypothesis. We show in a simulation study the performance of the envelope test in terms of empirical power and size in different scenarios. The proposed depth-based global approach has good power even for small differences and is robust to outliers. The methodology introduced is applied to test whether children with normal and low birth weight have similar growth pattern. We also analyzed a brain image dataset consisting of positron emission tomography scans of severe depressed patients and healthy controls. The global envelope test was used to find and visualize differences between the two groups.

Indexed as

BrainPositron-Emission TomographyChildComputer SimulationHumansbrain imagingdata depthenvelope testfunctional data

Identifiers

PMID33410197
PMCPMC9848787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.