Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33410116›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2021

Ambiguity and Ambivalence: an Issue for the Subjective Dynamics in the Relation between Language and Affection.

Marina Assis Pinheiro, Gessivânia de Moura Batista

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marina Assis PinheiroDepartment of Psychology, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Av. da Arquitetura, s/n, Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas - CFCH, 8° Andar, Recife, PE, 50740-550, Brazil. marinaassis.pinheiro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4019-0502
Gessivânia de Moura BatistaDepartment of Psychology, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Av. da Arquitetura, s/n, Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas - CFCH, 8° Andar, Recife, PE, 50740-550, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article stems from an interest taken in discussing the usage of the terms ambivalence and ambiguity, which are very present in Psychology's publications and savoir faire. It is important to reiterate that in common sense and even in scientific publications these terms are often used as synonyms or notions of little conceptual delimitation. The relevance of such differentiation is proposed once these notions participates of the emergence of the new in human subjective experience, and, in a methodological approach, ambiguity and ambivalence are dimensions that leads the researcher goes beyond a repetitive sterile description of the subject's speech, moving towards new perspectives of the psychological data. This paper aims to retrieve the qualifying power of such notions by making a broader reflection on the functions of language in the production of interpretive realities. We also propose to bring up a reflection about ambiguity in the construction of meaning and to reiterate ambivalences as inherent to human nature, its affective record and the process of human becoming. As a way to explain the proposed themes, we will analyse an excerpt from the documentary "Últimas Conversas", produced by the Brazilian filmmaker Eduardo Coutinho, in which high school students from public state schools in Rio de Janeiro tell their stories, speaking of dreams and shared challenges. The character Rafaela was selected for this article because of the emergence of unspeakable emotions from her narrative about an expected future as a promise of reconciliation with the alterity of her life story.

Indexed as

AffectLanguageBrazilEmotionsFemaleHumansStudentsAmbiguityAmbivalenceEduardo CoutinhoPsychology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.