ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
A comparative study on the effect of alternative and fossil energy consumption on economic growth and foreign direct investment in selected countries using SUR approach.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic insights and catalyst design for the selective hydrogenolysis of cellulose to CChemical science · 2026Review
- Achieving efficient almost CO-free hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming on Cu modified α-MoC.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Effects of globalization, foreign direct investment and economic growth on renewable electricity consumption.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Assessment of Foreign Direct Investment-Led Growth Argument in South Africa Amidst Urbanization and Industrialization: Evidence from Innovation Accounting Tests.Journal of the knowledge economy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Energy plays a vital role in every economy, and it can be considered as a driving force of economic growth. The interrelations of energy with the other variables are also significant. As many developing countries rely on energy consumption, attracting energy-intensive facilities and installations is being satisfied with foreign direct investment (FDI) which can affect environment negatively. Accordingly, FDI can stimulate economic growth and the use of energy through economic growth indirectly affects foreign direct investment. Therefore, the primary purpose of this research is a comparative study on the impact of fossil and alternative energy consumption on foreign direct investment and economic growth. Thereby, we figure out the knowledge and technology transferring via FDI and its effect on economic growth, in which direction should it be, and how it should be managed to cause less environmental pollution. So, this research consists of 14 selected developing countries for 1986-2016. The results, estimated through seemingly unrelated regression (SUR), show that alternative energy and fossil fuels have a positive effect on the GDP with the coefficient values of 0.10 and 0.02, respectively. Still oil rents do not affect economic growth. The same findings have been reached with the FDI, and energy resources amplified the foreign investment on the cost of CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
33410035What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.