Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33410025›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Supply chain carbon emission reductions and coordination when consumers have a strong preference for low-carbon products.

Mei-Lian Liu, Zong-Huo Li, Sajid Anwar, Yun Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mei-Lian LiuSchool of Business, Guilin University of Electronic and Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, 541004, People's Republic of China.
Zong-Huo LiSchool of Business, Guilin University of Electronic and Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, 541004, People's Republic of China.
Sajid AnwarSchool of Business, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia.
Yun ZhangSchool of Finance, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai, 201620, China. zhangyunphd@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-2154

Funding

National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences 13BJL093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to the rising concerns about environmental degradation worldwide, firms in several developed and developing countries are pursuing carbon emission reduction targets. In addition, in recent years, there is evidence of a shift in consumer preferences in favour of low-carbon products. Using a theoretical model, where the shift in consumer preferences is explicitly incorporated, we evaluate the impact of carbon emission reduction cost-sharing on supply chain profit. In our model, consumers are willing to pay a higher price for low-carbon products and hence the retailer considers sharing the cost of carbon emission reduction with the manufacturer. Our model also includes a carbon trading mechanism. We identify a range of carbon emission reduction cost-sharing such that both supply chain enterprises are better-off. We find that, while achieving the aim of carbon emission reduction, consumer preference for low-carbon products can benefit both supply chain enterprises. Numerical simulations show that carbon emission reduction cost-sharing increases the retailer's order quantity as well as the profit and hence there is an incentive for the two supply chain enterprises to cooperate.

Indexed as

CarbonCommerceConsumer BehaviorModels, TheoreticalCarbonCarbon emission reductionCarbon emission reduction cost sharingConsumer preference for low-carbon productsSupply chain management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.