Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33409980›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2021

Omega Loop Gastroileal Bypass (OLGIBP/SAGI) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): Medium-Term Results.

Radwan Kassir, Xavier Giudicelli, Patrice Lointier, Christophe Breton, Pierre Blanc

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Radwan KassirDepartment of Bariatric Surgery, CHU Felix-Guyon, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France. radwankassir42@hotmail.Fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3987-5272
Xavier GiudicelliDepartment of Bariatric Surgery, CHU Felix-Guyon, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France.
Patrice LointierDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Clinique de la Châtaigneraie, 63110, Beaumont, France.
Christophe BretonDepartment of Bariatric Surgery, Clinique chirurgicale mutualiste, Saint Etienne, France.
Pierre BlancDepartment of Bariatric Surgery, Clinique chirurgicale mutualiste, Saint Etienne, France.
Clinique Mutualiste Chirurgicale · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion · FRClinique Ambroise Paré · FRUniversity of Reunion Island · RE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn bariatric surgery, new surgical techniques are continually being developed. The one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become increasingly common since 2001. However, some patients experience bile reflux or excessive weight loss. This study aimed to assess a new bariatric procedure designed to avoid some of the drawbacks of conventional OAGB. MATERIAL AND

methodsTo lower the complication rate and pathophysiological impact after OAGB, we performed an omega loop gastroileal bypass (OLGIBP/SAGI) with a 300-cm common limb. We compared this technique with OAGB.

resultsSeventeen patients underwent OLGIBP and 23 underwent OAGB. Mean operative time was 108 min for OLGIBP vs 103 min for OAGB. The mean hospital length of stay was 3 days (1 to 7). No complications related to the gastroenterostomy occurred. At 3 years, among OAGB patients, there were 5 (21.7%) cases of bile reflux including 2 (8.7%) requiring a revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Among OLGIBP patients, there were 3 (17.6%) cases of bile reflux 1 (5.9%) requiring a revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. There was no albumin deficiency. At 3 years, % of total weight loss (TWL) was 43.6 + - 6.2 in the OAGB group vs 48.2 + - 7.4 in the OLGIBP group.

conclusionsThe bariatric and metabolic outcomes of OLGIBP are expected to be similar to those of OAGB. The OLGIBP technique should reduce the risks of malnutrition and bile reflux. The two techniques can be safely performed and offer alternatives in bariatric surgery.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryBile RefluxGastric BypassObesity, MorbidHumansWeight LossBile refluxOmega loop gastroileal bypass (OLGIBP)One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB)Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)Single anastomosis gastroileal bypass (SAGI)

Identifiers

PMID33409980
OpenAlexW3119948272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.