ArticleEJNMMI research2021
The significance of equivocal bone findings in staging PSMA imaging in the preoperative setting: validation of the PSMA-RADS version 1.0.
Article in EJNMMI research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Theranostics for prostate cancer: A Canadian multidisciplinary expert report.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Article
- Choline PET/CT in the PSMA Era: Clinical Repositioning, Biological Perspectives, and Emerging Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploring treatment models for oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: evolution of therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for equivocal lesions in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT according to PSMA-RADS 2.0 criteria.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System Version 1.0 versus 2.0 for Prostate Cancer Assessment.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- Structured reporting in prostate cancer: the revolution of quality in nuclear medicine scan interpretation.European radiology · 2024Article
- Medicinal (Radio) Chemistry: Building Radiopharmaceuticals for the Future.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- PSMA PET imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Reporting and Data System Version 2.0.European urology · 2023Article
- Predicting Outcomes of Indeterminate Bone Lesions onJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- PET Criteria by Cancer Type from Imaging Interpretation to Treatment Response Assessment: Beyond FDG PET Score.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparing the clinical performance and cost efficacy of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Assessment of malignancy and PSMA expression of uncertain bone foci in [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Freely available artificial intelligence for pelvic lymph node metastases in PSMA PET-CT that performs on par with nuclear medicine physicians.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- StagingEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Clinical insignificance of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Intraindividual comparison of [EJNMMI research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessing the extent of disease in newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PC) patients is crucial for tailoring an appropriate treatment approach. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) reportedly has greater accuracy than conventional imaging for staging PC. As with any imaging modality, pitfalls and nonspecific findings do occur. The PSMA reporting and data system (PSMA-RADS) version 1.0 offers structured interpretation of PSMA-targeted studies and classifies lesions by likelihood of clinical significance. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical significance of equivocal bone findings on staging PSMA-targeted imaging, as defined by PSMA-RADS version 1.0, in the preoperative setting. Fifteen of 406 consecutive patients staged by PET/CT prior to radical prostatectomy had equivocal bone lesions. The scans were retrospectively scored with the PSMA-RADS version 1.0 system, blinded to disease course and follow-up data. Postoperative persistence of prostate-specific antigen levels supported by imaging and histological findings was used as the reference standard for the true significance of equivocal imaging findings.
resultsThirteen of the 15 patients had an overall PSMA-RADS score of 3B, of whom only two had true metastatic disease. The remaining patients had scores of 4 (n = 1) or 5 (n = 1), all confirmed as true positive prostate-related malignant lesions. A per-lesion analysis identified 29 bone lesions, of which 27 were scored PSMA-RADS 3B, and only three of them were true metastases. Thus, debatable lesions proved to have no clinical significance in 84.6% of cases, and only 11% of equivocal PSMA-RADS 3B bone lesions were true positive.
conclusionsIn intermediate and high-risk patients staged prior to radical prostatectomy, the majority of PSMA-RADS 3B lesions are of no clinical relevance. Bone lesions judged as being highly suspicious for metastases (PSMA-RADS 4/5) were all validated as true positives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.