Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33409835›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2021

Visual multiple cross displacement amplification for the rapid identification of S. agalactiae immediately from vaginal and rectal swabs.

Xueqin Cheng, Zhiqian Dou, Jing Yang, Dexi Liu, Yulong Gu, Fenglin Cai, Xiaobing Li, Meifang Wang, Yijun Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xueqin ChengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medical, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Zhiqian DouDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Jing YangDepartment of Pharmacy, Wuhan General Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Dexi LiuDepartment of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Yulong GuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Fenglin CaiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medical, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Xiaobing LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medical, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China.
Meifang WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medical, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China. wmfpps02@hotmail.com.
Yijun TangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medical, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China. tangyijun_799@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8202-7084

Funding

Bureau of Science and Technology of Shiyan City 19Y34Innovation Team of Hubei University of Medicine FDFR201801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streptococcus agalactiae (S. agalactiae) is an important pathogen that can lead to neonatus and mother infection. The current existing techniques for the identification of S. agalactiae are limited by accuracy, speed and high-cost. Therefore, a new multiple cross displacement amplification (MCDA) assay was developed for test of the target pathogen immediately from vaginal and rectal swabs. MCDA primers screening were conducted targeting S. agalactiae pcsB gene, and one set of MCDA primers with better rapidity and efficiency was selected for establishing the S. agalactiae-MCDA assay. As a result, the MCDA method could be completed at a constant temperature of 61 °C, without the requirement of special equipment. The detection limit is 250 fg (31.5 copies) per reaction, all S. agalactiae strains displayed positive results, but not for non-S. agalactiae strains. The visual MCDA assay detected 16 positive samples from 200 clinical specimen, which were also detected positive by enrichment/qPCR. While the CHROMagar culture detected 6 positive samples. Thus, the MCDA assay is prefer to enrichment/qPCR and culture for detecting S. agalactiae from clinical specimen. Particularly, the whole test of MCDA takes about 63.1 min, including sample collection (3 min), DNA preparation (15 min), MCDA reaction (45 min) and result reporting (6 s). In addition, the cost was very economic, with only US$ 4.9. These results indicated that our S. agalaciae-MCDA assay is a rapid, sensitive and cost-efficient technique for target pathogen detection, and is more suitable than conventional assays for an urgent detection, especially for 'on-site' laboratories and resource-constrained settings.

Indexed as

Detection limitMultiple cross displacement amplificationStreptococcus agalactiae

Identifiers

PMID33409835
PMCPMC7788142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.