ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Diagnostic values of
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Iodine-123 Metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy with SPECT/CT and Fluorine-18-aluminum fluoride-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid-octreotide PET/CT in recurrent High-risk neuroblastoma after complete remission.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Review
- Diagnostic value ofPediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Review of Opsoclonus-Myoclonus Ataxia Syndrome in Pediatric Patients.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Benign paraspinal ganglioneuroma with paraneoplastic opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
- Adult-onset idiopathic opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2023Article
- Paraneoplastic syndrome in neuroophthalmology.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOpsoclonus myoclonus ataxia (OMA) syndrome, also known as "Kinsbourne syndrome" or "dancing eye syndrome," is a rare, paraneoplastic entity which may be associated with pediatric neuroblastic tumors and carry a grave prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the role of
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated the
resultsOf 38 patients (13 males, 25 females, aged 3-96 months), 18 (47.3%) had SSTR-expressing lesions (PET-positive), and histopathology revealed neuroblastic tumors in 17/18 lesions (neuroblastoma 14, ganglioneuroblastoma 2, and ganglioneuroma 1) and reactive hyperplasia in 1/18. The remaining 20/38 (52.6%) patients did not demonstrate SSTR-expressing lesions (PET-negative) and had an uneventful follow-up. The average SUVmax of the PET-positive lesions was 10.3 (range 2.8-34.5). The PET/CT results revealed 17 true-positive, one false-positive, 20 true-negative, and zero false-negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 100%, 95.2%, 94.4%, 100%, and 97.3% respectively.
conclusionsKEY POINTS: • Opsoclonus myoclonus ataxia (OMA) syndrome or "dancing eye syndrome" is a rare paraneoplastic entity which may be associated with pediatric neuroblastic tumors with a grave prognosis. •
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.