ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unmasking 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity: The clinical utility of dynamic myocardial CT perfusion: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: A Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Developing A Gold Standard for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnostics.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Patient-Specific Numerical Simulations of Coronary Artery Hemodynamics and Biomechanics: A Pathway to Clinical Use.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Review
- Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Coronary CT Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- 2023 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Coronary Syndrome.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2023Article
- Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reverse in lesion-specific ischemia patients with different Gensini score levels.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Distribution of FFRCT in single obstructive coronary stenosis and predictors for major adverse cardiac events: a propensity score matching study.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- Static CT myocardial perfusion imaging: image quality, artifacts including distribution and diagnostic performance compared toEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2022Article
- [Beyond Coronary CT Angiography: CT Fractional Flow Reserve and Perfusion].Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi · 2022Review
- Prevalence of pathological FFREuropean radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the diagnostic power of separately integrating on-site computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and static CT stress myocardial perfusion (CTP) with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in detecting patients with flow-limiting CAD. The flow-limiting stenosis was defined as obstructive (≥ 50%) stenosis by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with a corresponding perfusion deficit on stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/MPI).
methodsForty-eight patients (74 vessels) were enrolled who underwent research-indicated combined CTA-CTP (320-row CT scanner, temporal resolution 137 ms) and SPECT/MPI prior to conventional coronary angiography. CT-FFR was computed on-site using resting CCTA data with dedicated workstation-based software. All five imaging modalities were analyzed in blinded independent core laboratories. Logistic regression and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index were used to evaluate incremental differences in CT-FFR or CTP compared with CCTA alone.
resultsThe prevalence of obstructive CAD defined by combined ICA-SPECT/MPI was 40%. Per-vessel sensitivity and specificity were 95 and 42% for CCTA, 76 and 89% for CCTA + CTP, and 81 and 96% for CCTA + CT-FFR, respectively. The diagnostic performance of CCTA (AUC = 0.82) was improved by combining it with CT-FFR (AUC = 0.92, p = 0.01; IDI = 0.27, p < 0.001) or CTP (AUC = 0.90, p = 0.02; IDI = 0.18, p = 0.003).
conclusionOn-site CT-FFR combined with CCTA provides an incremental diagnostic improvement over CCTA alone in identifying patients with flow-limiting CAD defined by ICA + SPECT/MPI, with a comparable diagnostic accuracy for integrated CTP and CCTA. KEY POINTS: • Both on-site CT-FFR and CTP perform well with high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of flow-limiting stenosis. • Comparable diagnostic accuracy between CCTA + CT-FFR and CCTA + CTP is demonstrated to detect flow-limiting stenosis. • Integrated CT-FFR and CCTA derived from a single widened CCTA data acquisition can accurately and conveniently evaluate both coronary anatomy and physiology in the future management of patients with suspected CAD, without the need for additional vasodilator administration and contrast and radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33409778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.