Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33409756›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Comparison of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age.

Nicole O McPherson, Andrew D Vincent, Leanne Pacella-Ince, Kelton Tremellen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Indications for Micro-Injection of Sperm in Assisted Reproduction: A Consensus Statement.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Redox Regulation and Oxidative Stress in Mammalian Oocytes and Embryos DevelopedInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicole O McPhersonFreemasons Center for Male Health and Wellbeing, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. nicole.mcpherson@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3492-9403
Andrew D VincentFreemasons Center for Male Health and Wellbeing, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Leanne Pacella-InceRobinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Kelton TremellenRepromed, Dulwich, Adelaide, SA, 5065, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council Peter Doherty Early Career Research Fellow
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if the use of ICSI in women of advanced maternal age with non-male factor infertility increases chances of live birth.

methodsRetrospective data analysis of 10 years of cycle data from a single Australian IVF clinic (Repromed). First cycle patients only of an advanced maternal age (≥ 35 years) with non-male factor infertility utilising standard IVF or ICSI insemination and having at least three oocytes collected at egg pick up were assessed for live birth following transfer of single genetically unscreened blastocyst (N = 577). Subanalysis of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, fertilisation, embryo utilisation rate and having a blastocyst for transfer were considered. Unadjusted, covariate adjusted and propensity score weighted analysis were performed.

resultsThe use of standard IVF insemination in women ≥ 35 years with non-male factor infertility increased the chance of a live birth compared with ICSI insemination (unadjusted OR = 2.72, 95% CI [1.78, 4.17]; adjusted OR = 2.64, 95% CI [1.64, 4.27] and weighted OR = 2.26, 95% CI [1.72, 2.98] 31% vs 14%). All other outcomes (fertilisation rate, embryo utilisation, blastocyst for embryo transfer and miscarriage rate) were unaffected.

conclusionIn couples with advanced maternal age and non-male factor infertility, standard IVF insemination appears to increase the chance of a live birth compared with ICSI. As such, the results of this study support the use of routine IVF as the preferred insemination technique for older women in non-male factor infertility. However, future randomised controlled trials are still required to assess this policy.

Indexed as

AdultAustraliaBirth RateEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, FemaleLive BirthMaleMaternal AgePregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicEmbryologyFertilityInfertilityIVFPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33409756
PMCPMC7910332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.