ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021
Comparison of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indications for Micro-Injection of Sperm in Assisted Reproduction: A Consensus Statement.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- Conventional in vitro fertilization enhances preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy outcomes in couples with non-male factor infertility.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unveiling clinic variation in utilization of ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst transfer: a comprehensive study using the SART database (2014-2020).Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus in vitro fertilization in fresh cycles of women with advanced maternal age and nonmale factor infertility: A cross-sectional study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2025Article
- Article
- The impact of intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization on the reproductive outcomes of couples with non-male factor infertility and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of Treatment Outcomes among Sibling Oocytes Using Different Culture Systems-Conventional IVF versus INVOcell Device-And Evaluation of INVOcell User Satisfaction: The INVOcIVF Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Redox Regulation and Oxidative Stress in Mammalian Oocytes and Embryos DevelopedInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Comparison of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age: overlooked details.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- The Impact of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Non-Male Factor Infertility-A Critical Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine if the use of ICSI in women of advanced maternal age with non-male factor infertility increases chances of live birth.
methodsRetrospective data analysis of 10 years of cycle data from a single Australian IVF clinic (Repromed). First cycle patients only of an advanced maternal age (≥ 35 years) with non-male factor infertility utilising standard IVF or ICSI insemination and having at least three oocytes collected at egg pick up were assessed for live birth following transfer of single genetically unscreened blastocyst (N = 577). Subanalysis of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, fertilisation, embryo utilisation rate and having a blastocyst for transfer were considered. Unadjusted, covariate adjusted and propensity score weighted analysis were performed.
resultsThe use of standard IVF insemination in women ≥ 35 years with non-male factor infertility increased the chance of a live birth compared with ICSI insemination (unadjusted OR = 2.72, 95% CI [1.78, 4.17]; adjusted OR = 2.64, 95% CI [1.64, 4.27] and weighted OR = 2.26, 95% CI [1.72, 2.98] 31% vs 14%). All other outcomes (fertilisation rate, embryo utilisation, blastocyst for embryo transfer and miscarriage rate) were unaffected.
conclusionIn couples with advanced maternal age and non-male factor infertility, standard IVF insemination appears to increase the chance of a live birth compared with ICSI. As such, the results of this study support the use of routine IVF as the preferred insemination technique for older women in non-male factor infertility. However, future randomised controlled trials are still required to assess this policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.