Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33409720›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2021

Update on the Inflammatory Hypothesis of Coronary Artery Disease.

Julia Boland, Carlin Long

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Inflammation in Cardiovascular Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia BolandDepartment of Internal Medicine, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA. jboland@gwu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5637-2696
Carlin LongDepartment of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
George Washington University Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe pathogenesis and progression of coronary artery disease (CAD) is now known to be largely driven by inflammation on top of the well-accepted role for the disequilibrium between cholesterol deposition and removal from the arterial wall. Recent clinical trials have supported the inflammatory hypothesis of CAD and will be discussed in this review. RECENT

findingsThe clinical trial Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS) found that treatment with canakinumab, an anti-interleukin-1β agent, resulted in a reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or death. This provided evidence for the inflammatory hypothesis of CAD. However, canakinumab is not cost-effective for widespread therapy and more cost-effective treatments are warranted. The Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial (CIRT), Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (COLCOT), and Low-Dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) are recent clinical trials that increased the understanding of the inflammatory hypothesis of CAD. Cost-effective therapies targeting inflammation are the future of preventative CAD treatment. Additional clinical trials with anti-inflammatory and anti-cytokine agents would help delineate the most beneficial target for CAD prevention.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCoronary Artery DiseaseMyocardial InfarctionAnti-Inflammatory AgentsHumansInflammationAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAtherosclerosisCoronary artery diseaseCytokinesInflammationInflammatory hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID33409720
OpenAlexW3119917414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.