Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33409702›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2021

Molecular characterization and comparison of diagnostic methods for bovine respiratory viruses (BPIV-3, BRSV, BVDV, and BoHV-1) in field samples in northwestern Turkey.

Eda Baldan Toker, Kadir Yeşilbağ

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence of bovine respiratory disease viruses in calves from the central desert of Iran.Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eda Baldan TokerDepartment of Virology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey. edabaldan@uludag.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2468-3945
Kadir YeşilbağDepartment of Virology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ · TR

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu 119 O 571Uludağ Üniversitesi DDP(V)-2016/09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the compatibility among virus isolation (VI), ELISA, and PCR for diagnosis of the major viral agents (BPIV-3, BRSV, BVDV, and BoHV-1) responsible for BRD in the field samples. For that purpose, a total of 193 samples (133 nasal swabs and 60 lung tissue samples) from cattle with respiratory signs in northwestern Turkey were examined. For VI, all the samples were inoculated at least 3 blind passages onto MDBK cell culture. In addition, the samples were tested by hemadsorption assay and RT-PCR for BPIV-3; nested RT-PCR for BRSV; immunoperoxidase monolayer assay, antigen-ELISA, and RT-PCR for BVDV; and antigen-ELISA and PCR for BoHV-1. The detected 1 (0.52%) BPIV-3 isolate was found to be in the genotype BPIV-3c. No BRSV isolate could be obtained, while 5 (2.59%) samples were evaluated positive in nested-RT PCR. The presence of BVDV antigen in 10 (5.18%) samples and the BVDV genome in 5 (2.59%) samples were detected, while non-cytopathogenic BVDV isolates were obtained only in 2 (1.04%) samples. The detected BVDV strains fell into the genetic clusters of BVDV-1a, -1f, and -1l. For detection of BoHV-1, although viral isolation and Ag-ELISA results were negative, presence of BoHV-1.1 genome was detected in 2 (1.04%) samples. By the results of VI, ELISA, and PCRs, 10.88% (21/193) of samples were found positive for the evaluated viruses. Depending on the obtained data, combined uses of the diagnostic methods were evaluated to be more reliable for routine diagnosis of bovine respiratory viruses.

Indexed as

AnimalsBovine Respiratory Disease ComplexDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayLungNosePolymerase Chain ReactionRespiratory Syncytial Virus, BovineSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNATurkeyVirusesBoHV-1BPIV-3BRDBRSVBVDVDiagnosisELISAMolecular characterizationPCRVirus isolation

Identifiers

PMID33409702
OpenAlexW3118592853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.