Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33409681›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Meibomian glands visibility assessment through a new quantitative method.

José Vicente García-Marqués, Santiago García-Lázaro, Noelia Martínez-Albert, Alejandro Cerviño

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automation of dry eye disease quantitative assessment: A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

José Vicente García-MarquésDepartment of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Dr Moliner, 50 - 46100, Burjassot, Spain.
Santiago García-LázaroDepartment of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Dr Moliner, 50 - 46100, Burjassot, Spain. santiago.garcia-lazaro@uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8938-5194
Noelia Martínez-AlbertDepartment of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Dr Moliner, 50 - 46100, Burjassot, Spain.
Alejandro CerviñoDepartment of Optics and Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Valencia, C/Dr Moliner, 50 - 46100, Burjassot, Spain.

Funding

Universitat de València UV-INV-PREDOC16F1-385061Universitat de València UV-INV_PREDOC18F2-886420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to develop a new objective semiautomatic method for analysing Meibomian glands visibility quantitatively.

methodsOne hundred twelve healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 90 years (48.29 ± 27.46 years) participated in this study. Infrared meibography was obtained from the right upper eyelid through Oculus Keratograph 5 M. Meibographies were classified into 3 groups: Group 1 = patients with good subjective glands visibility and a gland dropout percentage < 1/3 of the total Meibomian gland area; Group 2 = patients with low subjective glands visibility and a gland dropout < 1/3; and Group 3 = patients with low subjective glands visibility and a gland dropout > 1/3. New metrics based on the visibility of the Meibomian glands were calculated and later compared between groups. Rho Spearman test was used to assess the correlation between each metric, and Meibomian gland dropout percentage with the entire sample and after excluding Group 2. A p value less than 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

resultsFifty-six subjects were classified in Group 1 (24.48 ± 9.62 years), 19 in Group 2 (69.16 ± 21.30 years) and 37 in Group 3 (73.59 ± 13.70 years). No statistically significant differences were found between Groups 1 and 2 in dropout percentage. All metrics, with the exception of entropy, showed a higher Meibomian gland visibility in Group 1 than in the other two groups. Moderate correlations were statistically significant for all metrics with the exception of entropy. Correlations were higher after excluding Group 2.

conclusionThe proposed method is able to assess Meibomian gland visibility in an objective and repeatable way, which might help clinicians enhance Meibomian gland dysfunction diagnosis and follow-up treatment.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesEyelid DiseasesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMeibomian GlandsMiddle AgedResearch DesignTearsYoung AdultDry eyeImage processingInfrared meibographyMeibomian gland dysfunctionMeibomian glandsObjective medical image analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.