ArticleInsights into imaging2021
Improving justification of medical exposures using ionising radiation: considerations and approaches from the European Society of Radiology.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions to reduce low-value imaging - a systematic review of interventions and outcomes.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Cumulative radiation exposure from repeated CT imaging in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: Does it matter?European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Interdependence of dental parameters, mandibular mobility and static postural sway as well as load distribution in male subjects of advanced working age.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Radiographers' Application of the Radiation Protection Principles of Justification, Optimisation and Dose Limits in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Justification of Imaging Referrals: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Referring Physicians' Knowledge, Practices, and Barriers.AJPM focus · 2026Article
- Appropriateness of CT Pulmonary Angiography Requests at Croydon University Hospital: An Audit.Cureus · 2025Article
- Positivity rates and subsequent patient dispositions after utilisation of cervical spine imaging referral guidelines in Singapore.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Effects of trauma mattress on dose and image quality of paediatric whole-body computed tomography examinations.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Patient-size based dose optimization in projection radiography examinations: A BMI-guided approach.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Development of optimised protocols for paediatric whole-body computed tomography examinations: a figure-of-merit approach.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Cohort profile: ORICAMs, a French cohort of medical workers exposed to low-dose ionizing radiation.PloS one · 2023Article
- CT Examinations for COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Protocols, Radiation Dose, and Numbers Needed to Diagnose and Predict.Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi · 2021Article
- Value-based radiology: what is the ESR doing, and what should we do in the future?Insights into imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This discussion paper has been produced within the context of the European Society of Radiology EuroSafe Imaging initiative and considers primarily the issues and challenges associated with justification of medical exposures using ionising radiation for individual patient diagnostic imaging procedures. It addresses both regulatory requirements and practical considerations and discusses approaches that are intended to improve justification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.