ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021
Determinants of regeneration and strength of hamstrings after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-fate of hamstring tendon.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Minimally Invasive Harvesting of Triple-Fold Superficial Layer Quadriceps Autograft for Knee Ligament Reconstruction.Arthroscopy techniques · 2023Article
- Hamstrings force-length relationships and their implications for angle-specific joint torques: a narrative review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2022Review
- Can we rebuild what has been taken? A narrative review of biological and functional consequences of hamstring tendon harvest in ACL surgery.Science progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimArthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgical procedure using hamstring autograft is the most common surgery performed in the arena of sports medicine and arthroscopy. Most studies in literature are ambiguous regarding the fate of hamstrings based on function, regenerative potential, and cross-sectional area (CSA). The aim of this research study is analysis of the fate of hamstring tendons (both semitendinosus and gracilis) during the time course for determinants of regeneration and strength.
methodsFifty patients who were operated for unilateral isolated ACL reconstruction from July 2015 to June 2018 were evaluated for the fate of harvested hamstring tendons which included the following: regeneration, cross-sectional area (CSA), strength, and insertion of regenerated hamstrings by isometric torque and isokinetic strength. MRI of knee was performed for both knees concerning the semitendinosus (ST), gracilis (G), Sartorius, biceps femoris, and medial head of gastrocnemius.
resultsEighty-four percent men and 16% women within a mean patient age of 34 ± 4.12 years were evaluated and all 50 (100%) patients demonstrated hamstring regeneration by the MRI measurements at six months and at one year post-ACL reconstruction. The torque of isometric knee flexion measured in 60° was found to be remarkably lower in the ACL-reconstructed lower extremity compared to that of the contralateral limb (87.13 ± 20.18% of BW), at 90° (49.17 ± 15.09% BW), and at 105° (43.91 ± 13.17% BW), respectively (p < 0.01). However, at 30° flexion and 45° flexion, the difference was insignificant (116.48 ± 21.07% BW for 30° and 100.16 ± 25.12% BW for 45°).
conclusionsIt was found that the properties of musculotendinous units of ST and G were significantly transformed after their harvesting for ACL reconstruction and these weaknesses contribute to the flexion deficit of knee in the deeper range of flexion in the operated limb. Therefore, approaches facilitating tendon regeneration and preservation must be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.