Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33409490›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2020

Amplified engagement of prefrontal cortex during control of voluntary action in Tourette syndrome.

Charlotte L Rae, Jim Parkinson, Sophie Betka, Cassandra D Gouldvan Praag, Samira Bouyagoub, Liliana Polyanska, Dennis E O Larsson, Neil A Harrison, Sarah N Garfinkel, Hugo D Critchley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Update on the Pathophysiology and Management of Tics.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Prefrontal allopregnanolone mediates the adverse effects of acute stress in a mouse model of tic pathophysiology.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Myoclonus and other jerky movement disorders.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Charlotte L RaeSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Sussex BN1 9QH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4503-4971
Jim ParkinsonSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Sussex BN1 9QH, UK.
Sophie BetkaDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Sussex BN1 9RY, UK.
Cassandra D Gouldvan PraagDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Sussex BN1 9RY, UK.
Samira BouyagoubDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Sussex BN1 9RY, UK.
Liliana PolyanskaDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Sussex BN1 9RY, UK.
Dennis E O LarssonSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Sussex BN1 9QH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8931-6065
Neil A HarrisonDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Sussex BN1 9RY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9584-3769
Sarah N GarfinkelSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.
Hugo D CritchleySackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tourette syndrome is characterized by 'unvoluntary' tics, which are compulsive, yet often temporarily suppressible. The inferior frontal gyrus is implicated in motor control, including inhibition of pre-potent actions through influences on downstream subcortical and motor regions. Although tic suppression in Tourette syndrome also engages the inferior frontal gyrus, it is unclear whether such prefrontal control of action is also dysfunctional: Tic suppression studies do not permit comparison with control groups, and neuroimaging studies of motor inhibition can be confounded by the concurrent expression or suppression of tics. Here, patients with Tourette syndrome were directly compared to control participants when performing an intentional inhibition task during functional MRI. Tic expression was recorded throughout for removal from statistical models. Participants were instructed to make a button press in response to Go cues, withhold responses to NoGo cues, and decide whether to press or withhold to 'Choose' cues. Overall performance was similar between groups, for both intentional inhibition rates (% Choose-Go) and reactive NoGo inhibition commission errors. A subliminal face prime elicited no additional effects on intentional or reactive inhibition. Across participants, the task activated prefrontal and motor cortices and subcortical nuclei, including pre-supplementary motor area, inferior frontal gyrus, insula, caudate nucleus, thalamus and primary motor cortex. In Tourette syndrome, activity was elevated in the inferior frontal gyrus, insula and basal ganglia, most notably within the right inferior frontal gyrus during voluntary action and inhibition (Choose-Go and Choose-NoGo), and reactive inhibition (NoGo-correct). Anatomically, the locus of this inferior frontal gyrus hyperactivation during control of voluntary action matched that previously reported for tic suppression. In Tourette syndrome, activity within the caudate nucleus was also enhanced during both intentional (Choose-NoGo) and reactive (NoGo-correct) inhibition. Strikingly, despite the absence of overt motor behaviour, primary motor cortex activity increased in patients with Tourette syndrome but decreased in controls during both reactive and intentional inhibition. Additionally, severity of premonitory sensations scaled with functional connectivity of the pre-supplementary motor area to the caudate nucleus, globus pallidus and thalamus when choosing to respond (Choose-Go). Together, these results suggest that patients with Tourette syndrome use equivalent prefrontal mechanisms to suppress tics and withhold non-tic actions, but require greater inferior frontal gyrus engagement than controls to overcome motor drive from hyperactive downstream regions, notably primary motor cortex. Moreover, premonitory sensations may cue midline motor regions to generate tics through interactions with the basal ganglia.

Indexed as

basal gangliamovement disordersneuropsychiatrytic disorderTourette’s syndrome

Identifiers

PMID33409490
PMCPMC7772099
OpenAlexW3108628047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.