Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33409435›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2020

Network topology of the marmoset connectome.

Zhen-Qi Liu, Ying-Qiu Zheng, Bratislav Misic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Towards a biologically annotated brain connectome.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Null models in network neuroscience.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Network topology of the marmoset connectome.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhen-Qi LiuMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0917-7905
Ying-Qiu ZhengBiomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-0700
Bratislav MisicMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-2862
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain is a complex network of interconnected and interacting neuronal populations. Global efforts to understand the emergence of behavior and the effect of perturbations depend on accurate reconstruction of white matter pathways, both in humans and in model organisms. An emerging animal model for next-generation applied neuroscience is the common marmoset (

Indexed as

Brain connectivityConnectomeMarmosetMotifPersistent homology

Identifiers

PMID33409435
PMCPMC7781610
OpenAlexW3045674499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.