Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33409379›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health reports2019

Postnatal care in Rwanda: facilitators and barriers to postnatal care attendance and recommendations to improve participation.

Pamela Williams, Nathalie Kayiramirwa Murindahabi, Elizabeth Butrick, David Nzeyimana, Felix Sayinzoga, Bernard Ngabo, Angèle Musabyimana, Sabine F Musange

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Safe recovery after cesarean in rural Africa: Technical consensus guidelines for post-discharge care.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pamela WilliamsInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Nathalie Kayiramirwa MurindahabiUniversity of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Elizabeth ButrickInstitute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
David NzeyimanaUniversity of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Felix SayinzogaMaternal, Child and Community Health Division, Rwanda Ministry of Health, Rwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
Bernard NgaboUniversity of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Angèle MusabyimanaUniversity of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Sabine F MusangeUniversity of Rwanda, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
University of Rwanda · RWGlobal Brain Health Institute · USRwanda Biomedical Center · RWUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSub-Saharan Africa has the highest rates of neonatal mortality in the world with an estimated 1.2 million deaths within the first 28 days of life. Postnatal care (PNC) can contribute to reductions in morbidity and mortality in mothers and newborns through vital support that identifies danger signs and establishes valuable practices and referral processes.

methodsThis qualitative data was collected as a part the East Africa Preterm Birth Initiative (PTBi-EA) to guide development of a group antenatal (ANC) and PNC model in Rwanda. Key-informant in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in four districts. Sixteen FGDs with 180 participants and 22 IDIs were completed at the time of thematic saturation.

resultsFour themes highlighted facilitators and barriers to PNC attendance and recommendations to improve participation: 1) There is little awareness in the community of what the PNC package is; PNC 4 in particular is not well understood; 2) PNC visits by community health workers (CHWs) are well accepted and valued; 3) Providers perceive PNC 4 as an added burden to an already high workload; 4) Community structures exist to better disseminate key messages about PNC, but have not yet been effectively utilized.

conclusionsThis qualitative work provides evidence that the PNC package was not initially well understood. Regardless, PNC service delivery performed by CHWs in Rwanda is well accepted and appreciated by the population, providing assurance that the full package has potential to be well utilized and valued by the population.

Identifiers

PMID33409379
PMCPMC7771583
OpenAlexW2954003585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.