ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2020
How to Create and Evaluate a Resident-Led Audio Program: Six Clinical Podcasts for Medicine House Staff.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring the impact, challenges, and integration of podcasts in patient education: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and Enablers to the Production of Open Access Medical Education Platforms: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Framework for a radiography student podcast.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2024Article
- Using Learning Analytics to Evaluate the Clinical Education Podcast Format.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- Podcast-Based Medical Education and Content Alignment with National Education Bodies.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- Guidelines: The Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows of Creating Open Educational Resources.Perspectives on medical education · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Podcasting in medical education has grown substantially. However, podcasts focused on internal medicine topics are relatively uncommon, and those created by or designed for medicine residents are rare. We investigated the feasibility and utilization of an open-access resident-created podcast targeted to the educational needs of internal medicine house staff. Methods: We distributed a needs assessment to 184 internal medicine residents at the University of Washington to assess podcast preferences and clinical scenarios perceived to be challenging. Based on the results, we developed a standardized method for podcast development and production. We created six episodes, utilizing a web-based podcasting platform. For outcome measures, we collected the number of unique downloads, and the perception of the podcast was evaluated by residents in comparison to other residency-sponsored educational activities with a survey. Results: Eighty-one residents (44%) completed the needs assessment, with participants expressing interest in resident-focused podcasts and a preference for relatively short episodes focused on high-yield clinical information. The episodes were downloaded 661 times. Residents gave the podcast an average rating of 4.32 out of 5 ( Discussion: Our resident-generated podcasts were desired, feasible, and well utilized. They were also rated highly compared to more traditional educational modalities. Our podcast-creation schema serves as a road map for trainees to develop podcasts. Podcasting can be a resource for resident education and an opportunity for residents to grow as medical educators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.