ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2020
New Percutaneous Options for Tricuspid Intervention: How to Identify the Good Clinical Candidate.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- TricValve Pop-Out: Management of Transcatheter Caval Valve Migration.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2022Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Failed Surgical Tricuspid Valve Annuloplasty.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tricuspid valve has been neglected for a long time and severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was largely undertreated in the past due to a high operative risk. In the last years we observed the development of different less invasive percutaneous options to treat TR. Currently, percutaneous treatments are reserved for high-risk patients presenting with advanced stage disease by which time they are likely to derive a partial benefit at best. There is a limited evidence base, including no randomized trials, to guide the management strategy for severe TR. In the interim we feel that choosing the best device for the most appropriate clinical candidate and with an adequate timing (most probably an "earlier" timing) will be the key combination to improve early and late outcomes of percutaneous treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.