ArticleJournal of caring sciences2020
Comparison of Fingertip vs Palm Site Sampling on Pain Perception, and Variation in Capillary Blood Glucose Level among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in Journal of caring sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05668702 (A Comparison of Two Regions Used in Capillary Blood Glucose Test in Terms of Pain and Result Consistency), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Comparison of Two Regions Used in Capillary Blood Glucose Test in Terms of Pain and Result Consistency
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vacuum-Assisted Needle-Free Capillary Blood Sampling.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Trial
- GlucoNeo Check in the community: feasibility of photoplethysmography-based non-invasive glucose screening.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- Long-term real-world performance of the Bayer Contour TS point-of-care testing glucose meters.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and Prospective Applications of 3D Membranes as a Sensor for Monitoring and Inducing Tissue Regeneration.Membranes · 2023Review
- Continuous monitoring of diabetes with an integrated microneedle biosensing device through 3D printing.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.