ArticleCureus2020
Interventional Study for Improving Health Information System in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Health Information System Interventions on Maternal and Child Health Service Utilizations in Ethiopia: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Global health, science and practice · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the DHIS2 platform for integrating sociomedical data to study wound care outcomes.PloS one · 2024Article
- Review
- Maternal Service Coverage and Its Relationship To Health Information System Performance: A Linked Facility and Population-Based Survey in Ethiopia.Global health, science and practice · 2022Article
- Contribution of health information system to child immunization services in Ethiopia: baseline study of 33 woredas.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To assess the improvement in the health information system in the district Nowshera by integrating the data reporting of the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) and Lady Health Worker (LHW) programs in the existing system. Methodology The study was conducted at district Nowshera and Swabi, Pakistan between May 2015 and May 2016 for a duration of one year. The data collection instruments used in the study were adapted from the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) tool package. The study was conducted in three phases during a period of one year. The first three months were utilized for baseline assessment. The next six months were being used for implementing the integration of the EPI and LHW, and the next three months were being used for the post-intervention evaluation. Microsoft Excel software was used to enter and analyze the data. A p < 0.05 was considered as the cut-off value for significance. Results The results indicated that the integration of data from the EPI and LHW with that of the existing Health Information System (HIS) is possible and has the potential for improving the existing system. The least significant results were produced by the use of information, which depicts that the utilization of data in decision making or policy making is still needed to be improved. Moreover, we reported a lack of enforcement and regulation by the authorities in monitoring the feedback system in the HIS. Conclusion The current study revealed significant improvements in the use of information, data quality, and behavior of staff. It is essential to properly train the team on how to operate the District Health Information System (DHIS) to gain adequate and timely data on health status and determinants. Additionally, the integration would benefit in managing the data at not only the national level but at the district level too.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.